Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jane Smiley: It's the Economists, Stupid!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:44 PM
Original message
Jane Smiley: It's the Economists, Stupid!
from HuffPost:




Jane Smiley
It's the Economists, Stupid!
Posted March 17, 2008 | 09:26 PM (EST)



The lead article at Slate today is about how American corporate managers have become the laughingstock of the world because they can no longer manage "complex systems" as they were once famous for doing.

If you want to read it, you can go to the link, but really, I thought, what's so hard to understand? The economy we have, with all its volatility, is exactly the economy any sane person would have predicted after the wholesale decline of regulation, as both a reality and an idea, in the eighties and nineties. And who has kept up the drumbeat for deregulation, not only here but everywhere, if not those screwy, and tenured, free-market economists? Their whole job for the last thirty years has been to prop up the egomania and greed of corporate CEOs by making that greed and ego-mania look both positive and unavoidable. As a result, the gambling side of capitalism has driven every other side away, to a chorus of bleats from the left that, Gosh, something big and bad was bound to happen, and an accompanying chorus from the right that even saying such a thing was treason.

Let's review. At the end of the 1970s, it was decided by some people that they weren't getting rich enough fast enough, and that they were tragically hampered in their efforts by government regulations that dictated, for example, that foods called by some generally understood name, such as "milk" actually had to be milk--not a milk-like product, not a milk-containing product, but truly milk, from cows. We had "stagflation" I remember it well. It might have gone away, or the shock of oil prices at the time might have induced "entrepreneurs", as they called themselves, to invent something new, but they went whining to the Republicans and the Republicans installed that phoney, Ronald Reagan, who installed another bunch of phonies in various offices of the regulatory agencies, and those phonies said that businesses were perfectly capable of reglating themselves, which everyone knew was a crock, since they had never regulated themselves and were openly getting rid of regulations so that they wouldn't have to regulate themselves or be regulated by anyone. Yes, capitalism is a shell game and all salesmen have a little of the snake-oil in them, which is what makes it fun and profitable, but also makes it persistently unscrupulous. The apologists for the "Reagan Devolution" were "Free Market" economists, whose idea of a human being, based on their experience of themselves, was a perfectly rational and isolated male who always acts in his own selfish interest. In addition to themselves, they were, of course, describing people with sociopathic personality disorder. These economists did what was in their selfish best interests to do -- they promoted and excused all the aspects of human nature that Jesus himself had found abhorrent and they made the world we have today.

The managers of our businesses learned what they know from these guys in their business schools, and guess what, that's why they can't manage their way out of a paper bag, because they're unregulated! The purpose of regulations is three-fold. 1. They prevent the "failure of the commons", a concept that describes why unregulated markets become more and more criminal -- if the unscrupulous run things, then the scrupulous have to give up some of their scruples just to save themselves, and so the whole system gets more and more criminal. 2. They give customers assurance that the things they spend their money on are more or less reliable. and 3. They keep the system relatively simpler than it is when there are no regulations, so the system is easier to understand and manage. What was it they said about the subprime mess? Oh, yeah, neither the buyers or the sellers of sliced and diced mortgage-backed securities knew what they were buying or selling. And they were the experts! ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-smiley/its-the-economists-stup_b_92006.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. 3 Recs Kick....
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R - nice piece, sums up so much of what I've been trying to put into words for a long time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. unregulated capitalism and the gifting of personhood on corporations
was the decline of our experiment in democracy.

They have privatized all the profits and socialized all the risks so that the CEOs can sit on the Boards of their buddies and all of them can laugh all the way to the mansions in the carribean.

I hope they all rot in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hey UIA! Glad you brought up the person-hood topic. I was recently discussing
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 10:05 PM by 54anickel
that with someone and they looked at me like I was nuts. Told them to google "corporate personhood". Just saw the guy yesterday and he was flabber-gasted! Gotta keep trying to do my part by putting a bug in people's ear so they try to re-edumacate themselves.

I was at this "churchy leadership thingie" (working on a website) a couple of weeks ago and just about puked when the keynote speaker started quoting and spouting praises for Jack Welch and that whole GE management mentality. When I tried to share my disgust with some of my colleagues they just didn't get it. Can't believe it's invaded even the old mainline churches so successfully.

God damn America indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. More kicks and recs!
Excellent piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, I think the cause is deeper: the decline in liberal arts education
and degrees. The "managerial class" of MBAs today is ignorant about literature, art, history, culture in general. Because of this ignorance, they have no context into which to put their perception of the world. They think they speak English, but their understanding and use of our language is primitive because they do not understand the subtle meanings of words that can only be learned by reading great literature -- and lots of it. They cannot analyze properly because they don't know enough about life. They only know the theory of organization and of business. But it takes a balanced human being who knows more than numbers and golf to make good decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. (a) It's the "tragedy of the commons"....
... and (b) She doesn't even describe it correctly - character has nothing essential to do with the concept.

We're a stupid, stupid country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. capitalism is cancer
unregulated, it metastasizes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC