Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WINNING

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:26 PM
Original message
WINNING
WHAT THE HELL ARE WE SUPPOSED TO WIN? WHAT DOES A WIN LOOK LIKE? DO WE NOT OCCUPY THE WHOLE FUCKING COUNTRY? DID WE NOT OVERTHROW SADDAM? WHAT THE FUCK ELSE IS THERE TO WIN???

:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:

:nuke: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Control of the oil. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh yes! That's it. Maybe Cheney was twisting some arms on his
little visit! "Give us the oil and we'll leave....well, most of us"! Wouldn't that be a coup for bush? Get the oil and start re-deploying before the end of his adminstration....then history would view him favorably. That's the ticket! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I don't think we'll ever leave
...as long as the criminals and their minions have power. But that wasn't the question. The question was "WHAT THE HELL ARE WE SUPPOSED TO WIN?"

Control of the oil is what BushCo and their business partners would consider a "win".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I agree with your definition of "win". But can they ever verbalize that?
I can't figure out how they would spin it after profusely denying that was ever an objective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I don't think they need to
They denied it, then Greenspan let this slip in his memoir late last year: "I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil."

There was little outrage, and would be even less now if Bush** actually came out and said it, because Americans are being crushed by gas prices. And sad to say I have the feeling people rationalize it that way: "We need the oil."

I'm also all but 100% certain the mad printing of currency and the hiding of M3 was, at least in part, to hike oil prices so Americans would be grateful for Bush**'s "genius" in invading Iraq to secure its oil.

Lots of people think BushCo are stupid and incompetent. Not me. I think they're clever bastards who should never be underestimated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thank you kindly for your knowledgeable response. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. There's no end game that's the problem. We'll never know if we are
or have won. I think that's the plan as maddening as it is. We lost the minute we went in...imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Done Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Total submission.
We get the oil, or should I say the oil companies get the oil.

We may need to subdue a few other countries since our presence will provoke violence.

This may sound somewhat unpleasant to you, but you must remember that the oil companies have a lot of money invested in refineries and super tankers.

You may say that the cost is too high, but what cost have the oil companies paid? What cost will they pay in the future? There is no cost, there has been no cost, to our corporate overlords, only higher prices, and greater profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Iraq Oil is going somewhere!
And acting as if it isn't is allowing the rip-off of cool trillions of $$$!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I work for workers Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. A stable and democratic Iraq?
GW mentions it every time he talks about the war. I'm always surprised by how many people act like they haven't seen a Bush speech in the past five years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatsMyBarack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I've never seen a * speech.
I avoid them like the Black Plague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. they had elections? check! the surge is working? check!
Lets go home now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Winning their hearts and minds, of course....
If we kill enough of them... especially civilians.... we'll have won their hearts!

In the words of LBJ "If you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow."

Hey... it worked in Vietnam, and it will work in Iraq. (Deep, dark, :sarcasm: intended)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. winning,
the propping up of a puppet government that does whatever the neocons tell it to do. Kinda similar to Noriega in Panama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Closing Saddam's rape and torture rooms and opening our own=winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Here you go!
(n) banana republic (a small country (especially in Central America) that is politically unstable and whose economy is dominated by foreign companies and depends on one export (such as bananas))

http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=banana%20republic

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC