update on Spitzer

[ensho]

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3088.shtml


-snip-

That’s just one man’s observation. Another man, Greg Palast, seems to think it was the op-ed piece Spitzer originally wrote for the Washington Post that said the $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and the Bush administration were illegally linked. Palast sees this bust as payback to Spitzer, who had been investigating the bank scandals.

-snip-

Despite the opposition of 50 states, Bush and his Boyz went right ahead and protected the banks, helping them help themselves to this most recent looting of the American economy. I guess that could get a guy’s butt in trouble, even if he was New York’s Governor, even if he was sitting on a stack of information presented to him in 2004 by 911Truth.Org, elaborately documenting that 9/11 was an inside job. This Spitzer guy had to be leveled, and fast, even though he had willingly blocked a top aide from 9/11 congressional testimony, and wittingly or not had helped the Bush Boyz. It’s amazing how the tentacles of this story spread out.
-snip-
----------------------------

that Spitzer was 'taken down' is a given

the why of it is still appearing

[Freddie Stubbs]

1. So, he was taken out because he was blocking the 9/11 investigation?

:shrug:

[rooney]

2. Sounds correct to me. Bush/Cheney to the Hague...........

[BrklynLiberal]

3. Wonder hoiw lkong it will take for the real truth of the motivation will be revealed..

I am still waiting for the truth about the JFK assassination.

[autorank]

4. K*R Of course... Palast is on this. Oops for BushCo n/t