Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Pushes for Quick Handling of MIERS, BOLTON Contempt Suit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:25 PM
Original message
House Pushes for Quick Handling of MIERS, BOLTON Contempt Suit
House Pushes for Quick Handling of Contempt Suit
By Paul Kiel - March 20, 2008 - http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/house_pushes_for_quick_handlin.php


A quick update on the House's lawsuit (http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/house_panel_files_suit_against.php) against Harriet Miers and White House chief of staff Josh Bolten. From The Politico (http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0308/House_Judiciary_seeks_speedy_ruling_in_civil_contempt_case_against_Bolten_Miers.html):

The House General Counsel's Office, which is representing the Judiciary Committee in a civil contempt lawsuit against White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former White House Counsel Harriet Miers, has asked a federal judge to set up an expedited schedule to resolve portions of the case, a schedule that would require a ruling by this summer, according to court documents filed today.

....

What the House wants is to just settle the White House's more expansive claims of privilege -- namely, that Miers didn't even need to show up in response to the House Judiciary Committee's subpoena and that both Bolten and Miers didn't even need to indicate what sort of documents the White House were claiming privilege for.

A private conference is scheduled for tomorrow. The judge's decision will likely indicate whether the House has any hope of hearing any actual testimony from Miers or seeing any documents from Bolten during the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Remember DU BP (before primaries) when threads like this were noticed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick, in hopes that something actually gets done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing will be done until Inherent Contempt is charged.
Appeals to the Justice Department fall on deaf ears, and an outcome to the benefit of the American People in this Supreme Court is doubtful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Impeach now instead of waiting to hear them plead the FIFTH!
We all know this leads to forcing them to plead the fifth, and no further.

WE either have the evidence to IMPEACH or we do not. I'll go with we do,
per HR 333 being sufficient to begin a process that should encompass
circumventing Executive Privilege on all possible fronts. Write the
resolution as broadly as possible and move forward as quickly as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. In other words, nothing is STILL happening, and it's happening as slowly as possible.
i n h e r e n t c o n t e m p t , y o u f u c k e r s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Come on Democratic Congress drink a little more Milk grow some more spine INHERENT CONTEMPT is the
Edited on Sat Mar-22-08 11:16 AM by sce56
only way to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. wow, this summer....geez, that's really, really fast
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 09:34 AM by spanone
:sarcasm:

i predict absolutely NOTHING will come from this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Judge Sets Schedule for House Contempt Suit
Judge Sets Schedule for House Contempt Suit
Paul Kiel - March 25, 2008 - http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/judge_sets_schedule_for_house.php


We knew that the House's lawsuit against White House officials would take awhile. And it turns out that it'll be June, at the earliest, before a judge makes his first decision in the House's suit against Harriet Miers and White House chief of staff Josh Bolten.

That relatively rapid pace (for the courts, at least) is the result of the House pushing for quicker resolution of some of the White House's more expansive claims of executive privilege. The court will decide first whether administration lawyers are right when they say that Miers didn't even need to show up in response to the House Judiciary Committee's subpoena and that both Bolten and Miers didn't even need to indicate what sort of documents the White House were claiming privilege for. ..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC