Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Zinn: Beyond the New Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:59 PM
Original message
Howard Zinn: Beyond the New Deal
from The Nation:



article | posted March 20, 2008 (April 7, 2008 issue)
Beyond the New Deal
Howard Zinn



We might wonder why no Democratic Party contender for the presidency has invoked the memory of the New Deal and its unprecedented series of laws aimed at helping people in need. The New Deal was tentative, cautious, bold enough to shake the pillars of the system but not to replace them. It created many jobs but left 9 million unemployed. It built public housing but not nearly enough. It helped large commercial farmers but not tenant farmers. Excluded from its programs were the poorest of the poor, especially blacks. As farm laborers, migrants or domestic workers, they didn't qualify for unemployment insurance, a minimum wage, Social Security or farm subsidies.

Still, in today's climate of endless war and uncontrolled greed, drawing upon the heritage of the 1930s would be a huge step forward. Perhaps the momentum of such a project could carry the nation past the limits of FDR's reforms, especially if there were a popular upsurge that demanded it. A candidate who points to the New Deal as a model for innovative legislation would be drawing on the huge reputation Franklin Roosevelt and his policies enjoy in this country, an admiration matched by no President since Lincoln. Imagine the response a Democratic candidate would get from the electorate if he or she spoke as follows:

"Our nation is in crisis, just as it was when Roosevelt took office. At that time, people desperately needed help, they needed jobs, decent housing, protection in old age. They needed to know that the government was for them and not just for the wealthy classes. This is what the American people need today.

"I will do what the New Deal did, to make up for the failure of the market system. It put millions of people to work through the Works Progress Administration, at all kinds of jobs, from building schools, hospitals, playgrounds, to repairing streets and bridges, to writing symphonies and painting murals and putting on plays. We can do that today for workers displaced by closed factories, for professionals downsized by a failed economy, for families needing two or three incomes to survive, for writers and musicians and other artists who struggle for security. .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080407/zinn




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sing it to me baby...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think such a candidate, if he spoke like that, would be savaged by the corporate press and...
suffer character assassination. I realize FDR is still considered one of the most popular presidents in American history, but I don't believe he would have won office if it weren't for the Great Depression.

If the economy were good or at least functioning, I highly doubt he would've won in 1932, much less get the Democratic nomination. He would be pigeonholed as a far leftist and ignored like Kucinich or a troublemaker like John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. FDR was the VP pick in 1920.
The Cox/Roosevelt ticket got 127 Electoral votes, which is not the worst defeat in history. In many ways Wilson was an Bush like figure, somehow getting us in to war and clamping down on civil liberties.

I think had Cox won, Roosevelt would have won with the benefit of incumbency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's why FDR ran a FAR more conservative campaign in '32. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. And we could have had a candidate who proposed the very thing...
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2007/08/kucinich_says_h.html

Dennis Kucinich likened himself to both FDR and Seabiscuit -- Franklin D. Roosevelt in proposing a 21st century New Deal and the legendary race horse in claiming that he'll come from way behind and win the Democratic nomination.

In an appearance this morning before the Globe editorial board, the Ohio congressman said as president he would create a new version of the 1930s Works Progress Administration to put Americans to work to fix the nation's crumbling infrastructure and to build a more environmentally friendly energy system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. True....but we have a mainstream media who trivialized him.
Noone fears a new New Deal more than corporate interests, Big Media included.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I do agree that the WPA or some equivalent should be resurrected. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC