Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repeal Heterosexual Marriage Rights!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:14 PM
Original message
Repeal Heterosexual Marriage Rights!!
Edited on Tue Feb-27-07 11:16 PM by Madspirit
Because of the below facts, I support repeal of the right for heterosexuals to marry: (This post has a point...<g>

Prevalence of Domestic Violence:

. The number one cause of death for pregnant women is murder by their baby’s father.

• Estimates range from 960,000 incidents of violence against a current or former spouse, boyfriend, or girlfriend per year to three million women who are physically abused by their husband or boyfriend per year.

• Around the world, at least one in every three women has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused during her lifetime.

• Nearly one-third of American women (31 percent) report being physically or sexually abused by a husband or boyfriend at some point in their lives, according to a 1998 Commonwealth Fund survey.

• Nearly 25 percent of American women report being raped and/or physically assaulted by a current or former spouse, cohabiting partner, or date at some time in their lifetime, according to the National Violence Against Women Survey, conducted from November 1995 to May 1996.

• Thirty percent of Americans say they know a woman who has been physically abused by her husband or boyfriend in the past year.

• In the year 2001, more than half a million American women (588,490 women) were victims of nonfatal violence committed by an intimate partner.

• Intimate partner violence is primarily a crime against women. In 2001, women accounted for 85 percent of the victims of intimate partner violence (588,490 total) and men accounted for approximately 15 percent of the victims (103,220 total).

• While women are less likely than men to be victims of violent crimes overall, women are five to eight times more likely than men to be victimized by an intimate partner.

• In 2001, intimate partner violence made up 20 percent of violent crime against women. The same year, intimate partners committed three percent of all violent crime against men.

• Women of all races are about equally vulnerable to violence by an intimate.

• Male violence against women does much more damage than female violence against men; women are much more likely to be injured than men.

• The most rapid growth in domestic relations caseloads is occurring in domestic violence filings.

Between 1993 and 1995, 18 of 32 states with three year filing figures reported an increase of 20 percent or more.

• Women are seven to 14 times more likely than men to report suffering severe physical assaults from an intimate partner.

• The health-related costs of rape, physical assault, stalking, and homicide by intimate partners exceed five point eight billion dollars each year (CDC study).

Domestic Homicides:
• On average, more than three women are murdered by their husbands or boyfriends in this country every day. In 2000, 1,247 women were killed by an intimate partner. The same year, 440 men were killed by an intimate partner.

• Women are much more likely than men to be killed by an intimate partner. In 2000, intimate partner homicides accounted for 33.5 percent of the murders of women and less than four percent of the murders of men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. stoopid idea. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. really glad you "get" it. Not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. The OP didn't use a 'sarcasm' emoticon in the post
Some people on DU don't seem to be able to pick up on satire if it doesn't come emblazoned with the :sarcasm: thingy plastered across it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. ok..."great" idea. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Come on it's a sacred institution that has hundreds of
years of proof that it works...:sarcasm:

You see these are the statistics that need to come out....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oy Vey.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Better we should seperate women and men at birth....
and they could live in totally seperate cultures. I think there was a religious sect that tried this. The Shackers.

Go ask them how it worked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Shakers dear...
There's still a couple left and they didn't believe in sex. You could only become a Shaker through conversion. They make/made lovely furniture though.
Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I think the "Shackers" are kinda the polar opposites of the "Shakers"...
don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. *snort*...exactly
Shakers/Shackers...opposites..
Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Marriage is a religious thing
Civil unions for everyone and that's it. If you wanna get "married", go to your local place of worship and do it there. That's not the government's problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Right On!
That's what the right wingers don't get. They think we are trying to steal the spiritual part from them. We already have that. Those who believe in that do. Find a gay friendly church or a gay church and get married. We want the LEGAL and we want it named the same for everyone because separate but equal is a contradiction in terms.

Thank-you.
Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Exactly!
If you notice, it's not that big of a deal. Very simple, in fact. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Uh, no. Marriage is a legal thing.
The IRS doesn't give a flying fuck what any church has to say about the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. For instance
Let's change that. For me, the word marriage carries a "religious" baggage, and the government should be in the partnership contracts/civil unions business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. OK.
Just go out and convince all those straight married couples to take a "step down." Because that's how they'll see it, and that's what everyone knows civil unions are compared to civil marriages.

Whether or not you have baggage attached to a particular word is of no consequence as far as the law is concerned. Marriage is a legal term first and foremost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. My attitude of late has been to invite
all those who want to make all marriages civil unions to start their own campaign. If you don't want to join us in our fight for equal marriage rights since you want everyone to have civil unions, then fight for civil unions for everyone.

Crickets, Harvey...do you hear crickets as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Crickets, m'friend.
They must be out collecting donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. We should get out stories straight.
The money should go to paying off a trip to NYC.

What a freakin' bunch of patsies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. I never argue with Mr. Peabody. A thought-provoking article.
Merrill Markoe says we should give marriage to gays for a few years to see if they tidy it up like they do bad neighborhoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. A Mr. Peabody lover!
Awww....

Dolly Parton said gays should be equally entitled to the misery...<g>...but I'm not that cynical. I've been with my girlfriend for 15 years...and I still like watching her walk away.

Now if only we could get insurance together and I could count on her to be the one to make the decisions if I'm in a hospital and can't, etc.
Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. I see no problem with this.
It's what the civil union supporters want, so, absolutely. Down with heterosexual marriage rights. Civil unions for all! Call me once your movement has been organized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. Equal rights for all. But based on your logic, don't drive within 10 miles of home
after all, that is where most accidents happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'm glad I never got married! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. If marriage is so sanctamonious....
..Then DIVORCE should be illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. does that word mean what you think it means? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Did I use it out of context as well as mispell it?? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I think you meant
"sanctified" (holy) not "sanctimonious" (false piety).

I understood what you meant.
Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
23. Hell...
...I always wanted to outlaw the recognition of heterosexual partnerships be it marriage or other, until everything is equal across the board.

After all the relationship I had with Sapphocrat was never recognized as being valid for immigration purposes. Yet Jo Blow down in the backwoods was able to get his mail order bride in, marry her, divorce her, and then order a new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
29. where the hell were you thirty years ago
when I really needed you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
30. Why the hell not?
Heteros have abused the piss out of the "sacred institution." I say take it away from 'em and give it to folks who won't take it for granted.

:patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC