Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Under Chief Justice Roberts, Supreme Court has toed the corporate line

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:04 AM
Original message
Under Chief Justice Roberts, Supreme Court has toed the corporate line
from the NY Times Mag., via ReclaimDemocracy!:



The Corporate Court
Under Chief Justice Roberts, Supreme Court has toed the corporate line
Print-friendly Page By Jeffrey Rosen
First Published by New York Times Magazine, March 16, 2008



I. The headquarters of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, located across from Lafayette Park in Washington, is a limestone structure that looks almost as majestic as the Supreme Court. The similarity is no coincidence: both buildings were designed by the same architect, Cass Gilbert. Lately, however, the affinities between the court and the chamber, a lavishly financed business-advocacy organization, seem to be more than just architectural. The Supreme Court term that ended last June was, by all measures, exceptionally good for American business. The chamber's litigation center filed briefs in 15 cases and its side won in 13 of them — the highest percentage of victories in the center's 30-year history. The current term, which ends this summer, has also been shaping up nicely for business interests.

I visited the chamber recently to talk with Robin Conrad, who heads the litigation effort, about her recent triumphs. Conrad, an appealing, soft-spoken woman, lives with her family on a horse farm in Maryland, where she rides with a fox-chasing club called the Howard County-Iron Bridge Hounds. Her office, playfully adorned by action figures of women like Xena the Warrior Princess and Hillary Rodham Clinton, has one of the most impressive views in Washington. “You can see the White House through the trees,” she said as we peered through a window overlooking the park. “In the old days, you could actually see people bathing in the fountain. Homeless people.”

Conrad was in an understandably cheerful mood. Though the current Supreme Court has a well-earned reputation for divisiveness, it has been surprisingly united in cases affecting business interests. Of the 30 business cases last term, 22 were decided unanimously, or with only one or two dissenting votes. Conrad said she was especially pleased that several of the most important decisions were written by liberal justices, speaking for liberal and conservative colleagues alike. In opinions last term, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and David Souter each went out of his or her way to question the use of lawsuits to challenge corporate wrongdoing — a strategy championed by progressive groups like Public Citizen but routinely denounced by conservatives as “regulation by litigation.” Conrad reeled off some of her favorite moments: “Justice Ginsburg talked about how ‘private-securities fraud actions, if not adequately contained, can be employed abusively.' Justice Breyer had a wonderful quote about how Congress was trying to ‘weed out unmeritorious securities lawsuits.' Justice Souter talked about how the threat of litigation ‘will push cost-conscious defendants to settle.' ”

Examples like these point to an ideological sea change on the Supreme Court. A generation ago, progressive and consumer groups petitioning the court could count on favorable majority opinions written by justices who viewed big business with skepticism — or even outright prejudice. An economic populist like William O. Douglas, the former New Deal crusader who served on the court from 1939 to 1975, once unapologetically announced that he was “ready to bend the law in favor of the environment and against the corporations.”

Today, however, there are no economic populists on the court, even on the liberal wing. And ever since John Roberts was appointed chief justice in 2005, the court has seemed only more receptive to business concerns. Forty percent of the cases the court heard last term involved business interests, up from around 30 percent in recent years. While the Rehnquist Court heard less than one antitrust decision a year, on average, between 1988 and 2003, the Roberts Court has heard seven in its first two terms — and all of them were decided in favor of the corporate defendants. .....(more)

The complete piece is at: http://reclaimdemocracy.org/articles/2008/supreme_court_corporate.php




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Serial Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is WHY no Dem should get mad at our candidates
It really upsets me when I hear that some Dems would rather vote to FREE RIDE MCLAME rather than HRC or BO!!

The court appointments at ALL LEVELS of the system mean a lot to our views and constitutional rights!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooBigaTent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. What makes you think that either HC or BO would appoint progressive judges
and justices?

The article clearly points out that the entire court, even the so-call liberals, are so far-right that the differences among them are not worth fighting about. If they ALL toe the corporate line, what is the fuss about?

There are NO LIBERALS on the Supreme Court - just degrees of conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Serial Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's my feeling they would do better than Dubya's & Raygun's appointments!
And do tell me why you think otherwise?

But I did specifically say that appointments are important at all levels of the court system that includes Federal District courts and Federal appealate courts, not JUST the Supreme court.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. this is why so many Dems voted for Roberts and Scalito
that corporate cash greases all palms in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. And anyone is actually surprised by this?
We knew exactly what these corporatists would do.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. and the traditional GoP Corporate Media establishment just smiles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well I'm Sure the Wealthy Elite Won't Mind Backlash
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 02:19 PM by fascisthunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC