Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This really is a stunning visual aid about where our money goes.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:50 PM
Original message
This really is a stunning visual aid about where our money goes.

Send it to all your right-wing friends/relatives and maybe they'll understand finally:

http://www.truemajorityaction.org/oreos/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Loved It. Thanks!
Even a 5 year old could understand that. Of course, it could still be beyond some right wingers. I wonder if * could get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. You Should Post This In The Economic Forum Too nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. That info has some problems
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 11:08 PM by Juche
By only talking about k-12 education and federal funding, they are ignoring the role of state funding in k-12 education.

http://www.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/10facts/index.html

Total taxpayer investment in K-12 education in the United States for the 2004-05 school year is estimated to be $536 billion.


Also our military budget is much more than $400 billion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget%2C_2008

$481.4 billion (+12.1%) - United States Department of Defense
$145.2 billion (+45.8%) - Global War on Terror
$39.4 billion (+18.7%) - United States Department of Veterans Affairs

"The Iraq war and the Afghanistan war are not part of the defense budget; they are appropriations."

So probably another $170 billion for the Iraq & Afghan wars.

Also, medicaid generally helps poor kids

$209 billion (+5.6%) - Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)

Plus states pay a large matching amt to medicaid and SCHIP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "they are ignoring the role of state funding"
It wasn't about state funding, was it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It is misleading
Unless you are a mindless partisan who already has made his mind up, it is not too influential to present misleading information because the truth will eventually out.

That is like when Rush Limbaugh says 'the top 50% of income earners pay 96% of income taxes'. Yeah, and they pay less in SS and FICA taxes. It is a misleading argument and once people figure it out, it backfires.

The reality is the US (local, state & federal) spends about 3 trillion on education, healthcare, social security & welfare and only about 700 billion on the military.

I'm open to more social spending, but when you only give half the facts people end up turning on you eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The Federal Budget is the topic. He says that in the beginning.
It's only misleading if you change the premise, such as you have done.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It is misleading because it ignored pertinent info
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 11:41 PM by Juche
Limbaugh has done the same thing.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/cy2003.guest.html

http://www.moderateindependent.com/v1i15taxnumbers.htm

By selectively picking and choosing which taxes count and which ones do not Limbaugh is implying that the rich are taxed too heavily and the poor are taxed too lightly. And when people find out the truth, this makes Limbaugh look untrustworthy.

This group is doing the same thing, ignoring taxes and spending that occurs that show we are spending far more on education or social welfare than this PSA implies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apinionated Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Welcome to DU & thanks for the Rush Limbaugh links.
Making Limbaugh "look" untrustworthy, eh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Oh, so you're linking to a Rush Limbaugh site.....
As though we will pounce upon it.

No way, nobody nohow's gonna make me go to a Rush Limbaugh site willingly. Seriously, I won't. Nope...eh....no......no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. very interesting, linking El Pigboy
here, I'd say :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
synapsesfiring Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Missing the Point
You are looking at 1 tree and not seeing the forest!

States fund schools through property taxes, but they are subsidized by the federal government. One interesting point would have been to ask what is happening to all the Lottery money? State lotteries generate millions every year, but I never hear about how much goes to schools (which is the rationale behind state-sponsored gambling).

Higher totals for defense spending only reinforce the point: we are GROSSLY OVERFUNDING DEFENSE while IGNORING MUCH NEEDED DOMESTIC PROGRAMS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I agree somewhat
We don't need $700 billion in military spending, there is no reason for it. No conventional military compares to ours, and at the same time we can't occupy a 3rd world country (which is good as it means the death of imperialism) like Vietnam or Iraq.

So yeah we should cut 200-300 billion out of the military via ending the war in Iraq and cutting conventional military force and spending it on social programs.

i don't see how I'm missing the point though because when you look at federal and state spending we spend about 4x more on welfare, education and healthcare than the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Another look at the Federal Budget.
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 02:55 AM by MattSh


Total Outlays (Federal Funds): $2,650 billion
MILITARY: 54% and $1,449 billion
NON-MILITARY: 46% and $1,210 billion




That's WAY more than $700 Billion.

http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. That doesn't even take into account what we pay in debt expense
We pay about as much in Interest on our National debt as we do Defense spending. If we paid down/off our debt we could spend the same on defense and have all the other programs well financed as well. National Health Care would could our expenses tremendously...and it would free up business to cut prices and increase wages..We live in a retarded nation..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Joined...
K&R I think my right wing relatives still wouldn't get it though... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Social Security Surplusses are being used fo pay for Bush's tax cuts and Iraq . . .
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 11:40 PM by defendandprotect
and who knows what else --- !!!

We were supposed to have the fund/surplus locked --- but WAR/national security are always
winning arguments -- !!!

Since the days of the first Gulf War --- and maybe before/I'm not positive -- we've had
OFF BUDGET items . . . kind of the same idea of what the corps have been doing in false reporting!!!

In other words, we're creating debt that isn't even part of our KNOWN budget ---

Kind of like "off the record" . . .

I'm sure someone here can explain this better ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R and Joined.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. cool
:thumbsup:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. This is cool. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. Joined and sent to relatives, thanks (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. awesome
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC