Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Party of Death - A Primer for Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:32 PM
Original message
The Party of Death - A Primer for Democrats
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 09:08 PM by arendt
For thirty years, the GOP have called Democrats every variation of coward/faggot/ sissy/commie/traitor; and it has been a rousing success for them. No matter that their candidates would stink up a skunk works. Hatred sells well; and the GOP have the best name brand of hatred in America. But its not just generic hatred. It is deep, religious, ontological hatred of everything and everybody who deviates from their insane fundamentalist cult in the slightest degree - whether in religious or in economic "dogma".

We have had almost thirty years to learn that there is no such thing as compromise with this cult. ("Bipartisanship is just another name for date rape." - Grover Norquist) And yet, the leadership and candidates of the Democratic Party (LDP) seem to have learned nothing. They foolishly continue to try to work with these gangsters, and they keep getting rolled. So here are some lessons for them:

Lesson 1:
The GOP is the Party of Death (POD).

This is the ground truth that no "name" Democrat dares to speak. This is the "frame" the LDP will not use. (Why the LDP has not used such a winning frame is discussed in Lesson 7.)

The followers of the POD are obedient zombies with a death wish - POD people. This is another truth that is "hidden in plain sight". The only people who could possibly accept the POD program are people brainwashed by self-loathing, death-worshipping fundamentalist religion.

The brain-dead strategists of the LDP let the POD call themselves the "pro-life" party and the Democrats the "pro-death" party, when everyone still awake and fighting for his/her life knows that this is the biggest Big Lie ever told in American politics.

Lesson 2:

The LDP lets the POD paint sane policy, diplomacy, and non-military approaches to problems as basically wrong-headed. The Congressional Democrats cave-in and vote for more war and more killing and more POD judges in an utterly futile attempt to "prove" that they are as "tough" as the POD. The Democrats need to start fighting for what their voters believe in, or their voters are going to go somewhere else.

The LDP and its two candidates should be organizing themselves around one theme with many inter-related sub-themes:

The Democratic Party is fighting for life:

- for the continuation of biological life (i.e., the environment) on the planet,

- for the continuation of middle class life and democracy in America,

- for the continuation of education and science - knowledge that saves lives

- for the end of "wars of choice" that are killing and maiming
....tens of thousands of Americans and millions of third world victims.

The POD is fighting for death on all these fronts.

Lesson 3:

The POD are killing the environment, and thereby, humans


Ever since the infamous James Watt made it clear that he didn't care about the environment because the "end times" were coming, the environmental movement has known that POD-people hate the planet. The environmental policies of the Bush Administration are appalling. More pollution, more habitat destruction, fighting against the proven facts of climate change. The killing of budget items that support environmentally-friendly alternative energy.

We have seen population collapses in frogs, birds, bees, and bats; but these generated no worries. However, now, we see salmon fisheries in collapse. Major fisheries like the Georges Bank and the Chesapeake Bay are producing at 10% of their former rate. With the diversion of corn to the energetically-unsound corn-ethanol program, food stockpiles are headed to zero and the prospect of Malthusian starvation has reappeared.

But, its even worse. Parts of the lunatic fundamentalist fringe openly state that we hasten the end times by using up the planet's resources. (Every POD office-holder who is a fundamentalist needs to be confronted with this statement. Its a lose-lose proposition for him to answer it.)

A more subtle way the POD are killing the planet is by promoting over-population. They actively fight against even birth control, much less abortion. POD-people pharmacists and doctors betray their hypocratic oaths. The POD fight against sex education, because it is statistically shown that ignorant teenagers have more illegitimate children. They use advertising to make too many children seem normal - to induce suckers to have children they cannot afford. (What else is there to make of TV shows like "Jon and Kate Plus 8"?)


Lesson 4:

The POD are killing the American middle class by ruining its economy and regulatory structures.


The POD has spent the last seven years looting this country. They have failed to enforce even the minimal financial regulations still on the books. The ripoffs to taxpayers and stockholders include: Enron, no-bid military contracts to both large (Haliburton) and small (the 22 year old supplier to Afghanistan) players , the Homeland Security pig-trough, the refusal to cap obscene oil and pharmaceutical prices, and the subprime mortgage looting. In the last few weeks, the looting of taxpayer dollars has dramatically escalated, to the tune of $250 Billion in a few months: the dollar-killing interest rate cuts; and the Bear Stearns bailout (part of the grand-scale looting called "support" for the banking industry) .

Even Treasury Secretary Paulson remarked that "deregulation had gone too far".

At the same time they are looting the middle class's savings, the POD is de-industrializing the country - sending our jobs to the third world. The loss in buying power, and the loss in medical benefits, results literally in the unnecessary deaths of Americans who have been effectively priced out of the medical system and into unhealthy diets and lifestyles. More profit for the POD; more death for the middle class. Putting POD foxes in the regulatory hen-houses has also gutted food and drug safety regulations, resulting in deaths from contaminated foods and medicines imported from China - deaths that would have been unthinkable ten years ago.

The Iraq Occupation contributes substantially to the impoverishment of the American middle class. Estimates range from one to three TRILLION dollars that could have been used for peaceful, life-supporting purposes at home. We are spending a billion dollars a week to IMPORT oil INTO Iraq to keep our war machine running.

Talk about spending the food and rent money on a drunken spree!

Lesson 5:

The POD are killing the American middle class by destroying the educational system and by politicizing science.


The POD absorbed the segregationist agenda of opposition to Federal supervision of education. Then they extended it to a general war against "liberal" education, where liberal meant anything that rabid fundamentalists disagreed with. The POD funded the Charter school fraud, and promoted the home schooling Madrassa movement. At each step, they weakened public education and then claimed they took action because the public schools had failed them. What humbug.

Of course, now that they have wrecked the schools and imported a bunch of Chinese and Indian low-wage tech workers, they can claim that American workers aren't competitive. This is only true if you believe an American could survive in America on Chinese wages. But, it serves to illustrate the self-reinforcing nature of the POD policies. The goal here is to destroy the American middle class, reducing it to the same wage slavery that we see in China today.

Another synergy of the POD policy to destroy education is that the new industry of "junk science" for political purposes is that much harder to explain now that a whole generation has been put through the wrecked primary/secondary education system. To people who are being regimented with the dropout-inducing "No Child Left Behind" rote-learning system, the junk science arguments seem plausible and the balanced (but, non-objective) news reporting does nothing to educate them.

As a result, policies that create real hazards to American lives get fraudulent scientific cover. Status quo preserving technologies, like oil drilling and ethanol, are promoted even when financial and environmental return on unsubsidized investment are negative. Global warming is denied. Vaccines are denounced as promoting promiscuity. Medical crackpots get a free Congressional pass to appointments in the government.

Then, we are shocked, shocked when some preventable tragedy happens (i.e., some American dies). Then we hear the all-purpose cop-out: "No one could have forseen." Yeah, if you poke out my eyes, I can't foresee much.

Lesson 6:

The POD are proud of waging wars of aggression, for example, killing on the order of a million Iraqis


It is Strangelovian to say that we are fighting this war for peace or democracy or modernization of the Middle East. The war is known to be based on lies. The occupation has started a massive civil war in Iraq. The war has set back the position of women in what was the most secular country in the Mideast. Religious fanaticism rules the whole country. The infrastructure has been pulverized to rubble. Iran had to send electricity to Basra.

As we wage this war, we use countless rounds of Depleted Uranium (DepUr) ammunition. Background radiation levels in Iraq are hundreds of times normal. Deformed babies are commonplace. American soldiers are suffering "Iraq War Syndrome". The use of DepUr is another crime against life by the POD. They can't even fight within the rules of war. They are sickening our own soldiers and the people we say we are fighting to defend. (Of course, we are really there to steal their oil for the already rich oil companies.)

All the signs point to an unprovoked attack on Iran, with a high chance that we will use tactical nukes. John McCain makes a sick joke about this with a song. This is INSANE. This is the Party of Death for all to see. Why do the Democrats refuse to slam this hard and often before it is too late?

Lesson 7: The Common Thread of the POD's program is fundamentalism

Here is the unspoken reason why the LDP refuses to confront the POD, even though the POD is demonstrably insane. (E.g., keeps declaring Iraq will be a success and the economy will correct itself - no matter how many times it is proven wrong.) To effectively connect the dots on the POD, it is necessary to confront fundamentalism and irrationality. These insane policies are interwoven with an insane, death-worshipping fundamentalist worldview.

Notice that I did not say a Christian fundamentalist worldview. That is because I believe that all fundamentalisms, in whatever religion you find them, are the same. They are all anti-intellectual, misogynist, body-hating drones who are enduring this world only to earn their heavenly reward. The many strictures on purity and chastity and avoiding the snares of Satan/Shaitan that they obey, day-in and day-out for all their miserable lives, would drive anyone nuts.

What exactly are these shared fundamentals (of the three monotheisms)?...

- hatred of intelligence, which monotheists reject in favor of submission and
....obedience
- hatred of life coupled with a passionate and unshakable obsession with death
- hatred of the here and now, consistently undervalued in favor of a beyond...
- hatred of the corruptible body, disparaged in every aspect, while the soul is
....invested with all the higher qualities and virtues; and finally,
- hatred of women, condemnation of liberated sexuality and sex for pleasure.

- "The Atheist Manifesto"

And, there is the core of it. To tell the truth about fundamentalist insanity is to lay oneself open to the intellectually bogus, but politically fatal, charge of "atheism".

The LDP believes that attacking ANY religious group will lead to the fatal riposte of "atheist", no matter how bent on national and global suicide a particular religious cult might be. So, they let the press crucify Obama for his pastor's remarks, but they go light on fundamentalist support for McCain and McCain's transparent opportunism in accepting this support.

Religion has become the new third rail of American politics. It didn't used to be so. Historically, religions battled for influence by political means, but there were always counter-vailing forces and cross-cutting issues in a country that had a secular government. That is all gone. We live today in a proto-theocracy, where lunatic right wing fundamentalists have political veto power, if not outright control of our judiciary and executive.

The Democrats have to find away to disarm this theo-bomb.

In this primer, I have tried to show such a way: The Democratic Party stands for the continuation of life on the planet and the middle class in America. They can play this position as both altruistic and as selfish (survival). This makes it hard to successfully attack.

The Democrats simply need to point out the death worship, the self-inflicted suffering, the self-lobotomized insanity of POD fundamentalism - and the traitorous looting of America by its financial-fundamentalist elites. They can hide behind whatever priest, rabbi, imam, or shaman they can find. But, if the Dems don't address fundamentalism head on, we will lose this election and we will lose America and we will lose this beautiful planet. Forever.

End of Primer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great
I love Lakoff and framing.

Another good frame to invoke is that the democrats are the party of inclusiveness and fairness.

Democrats want the political, social & economic system to be as expansive, inclusive and fair as possible. So they are always fighting for laws to give women the right to vote, animal rights, rights for low wage workers, worker rights, minority rights, protection for people overseas, etc. Democrats are always trying to expand the 'system' to make it as fair and inclusive as possible so everyone gets to use their talents and be protected.

Conservatives want the political, social & economic system as exclusive and are indifferent to fairness. If conservatives

Always remind people of what is at stake. If conservatives had won every battle in history then women & blacks wouldn't be allowed to vote. We wouldn't have medicare, medicaid or social security. jim crow would still exist. Women would have very limited opportunities in life. Animal rights would not exist. Labor law would be non-existant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I love Lakoff too; that's why I think POD is the frame to use...
The inclusivity you bring up is pretty abstract. The right to vote seems pretty worthless right now.

OTOH, everyone understands DEATH. The POD have been beating the shit out of Dems with "pro-life" (Sic) for decades. True Blue Dems are aching to hear someone stand up and shove it right back to the POD.

No offense, but your approach is just too wimpy. We are fighting for our lives here, not conducting a civics class.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Nope
The GOP has been beating up the dems by painting them as wimps who want to take your tax money and give it to people who don't deserve it while the GOP are tough and want to leave you alone. That is where the Reagan democrats got their impedus. Portraying your enemy as 'not one of us' is sadly pretty effective in politics considering how well the GOP used it.

Read 'being right is not enough' by Paul Waldman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I will try to find your citation, but I don't get your point...
> Portraying your enemy as 'not one of us' is sadly pretty effective in politics considering how well the GOP used it

This seems to be your point. But, I don't see how it applies to what I said.

I say that the majority of Americans think fundamentalists are "not one of us", and that any Dem with the balls to stand up and say so will win.

Your point seems to contradict your earlier statements about tolerance and inclusion.

I'm just confused. Could you please give me some more detail?

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. So I read this interview with Waldman...
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 10:41 PM by arendt
http://www.buzzflash.com/interviews/06/05/int06019.html

or, I read enough of it to get his point. I bookmarked it for a full read later.

I hear his frame. At least he understands what a frame is, and what an incoherent mess the Democratic Party is these days.

But, I think my frame is just as good as his. I think that saying the Democrats are for life and livelihood is the same as saying "we are all in this together". In fact, I think its better because fear is a stronger motivator than hope.

At this moment, I am scared shitless. The POD mean to kill the middle class. They don't care if they start a nuclear war. Opposing that is beyond just asking people to "be in this together". Opposition means praying that someone is brave enough to bell this cat from hell before it devours all us mice.

I am fine with Waldman's program AFTER we pry the guns from the hands of the dangerous lunatics who are running the country and the planet into the ground. If they start nuking Iran, social security is going to seem pretty meaningless.

Maybe we differ on time frames. At this point, I think of the moderately predictable "future" as being about three months. Beyond then, we could be fighting another war; the country could be in a recession; some false flag terror attack could push us into martial law; the changing climate could hit us with severe storms or drought (like in the Southeast) big enough to cause real panic.

To my ear, Waldman seems over-confident about the underlying continuity of our privileged life style here in America, and the amount of time we have to change course.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bravo! Go directly to the Greatest Page!
Spot on! The religiously insane have a stranglehold on American political leadership. We MUST reestablish complete secular control of government to the extent that one's religious beliefs have neither any place nor any relevance in public office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrycarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. K+R NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. So, would anyone adopt this approach in their politicing?
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 09:32 PM by arendt
My goal here is to share what I believe to be a viable frame.

I never really liked Lakoff's Strict Father/Nurturing Mother frame because it plays right into the crazy macho-ness of the GOP. We can't win by writing off the votes of sane conservatives.

I think that a sane conservative will hear "Party of Death" and immediately think it means the Democrats. Then, you have the opportunity to reach that person. Said person will be aware of the economic mess, but he may not have conceptualized it as "killing the middle class". Said person may have heard of global warming, but he may not have conceptualized it as "killing the planet". Said person may have heard about the death toll in Iraq and blown it off, but he may reassess that when you put in into the same frame as planet-killing.

"Kill" and "death" are very powerful words for conservatives. They are the kind of heavy caliber ammunition the Dems need to be firing if they are going to do any damage to Insane McCain.

We must go straight at McCain's war hero status. Whatever status he had, he sold out a long, long time ago:
....Divorce to marry a hotter babe (how fundamentalist)
....Keating 5
....Bootlicking Jerry Falwell (so much for Mr. Maverick).

We need to separate McCain from the fundies and the fundies from America.

What do you think?

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Recommend
One thing to say tho.

I ain't no fundie, but I dunno if we can undo the damage the POD has done, the psycho-cultural traumatizing of humanity that POD has done and before them various empires(civilizing process) and before that bloody tooth and claw nature,and before that death regardless of what you think feel, believe,want, it takes all life and death causes alot of trauma too..natural disasters accidents sickness,there is too much suffering here even without fundamentalist assholes. This existence is painful,to be here, for some it's more painful for others, less, but it HURTS if one gets honest about it. Death is everywhere and life is too and life cannot overcome death without becoming cancer or suicidal.. Add up all that pain from nature the predation process,the civilizing process,all the broken hearts minds bodies lives generation after generation from the moment we became conscious we exist in a reality we cannot control we cannot predict or save ourselves or each other from the ravages of it.. I think fundamentalism is one side of a reaction to suffering that life is, because we care, we do not want the beings we love to die,get hurt,get sick grow old or be eaten by leopards.But this kind of shit happens. For some they can just endure it blot it out of their minds screaming ever forward...and hope we can evolve..or get out of here. This world is like a bio based prison ,we must live here until we die and we all know we will die,just not how or when. This kind of threat that our own deaths and the death and suffering and passing of anything and everything we hold dear is something we all live with .That is enough to traumatize anyone with any empathy or love inside them.

But others see too much of this reality too soon and they are scarred by the truth of how violent, ugly,capricious and cruel life can be how impersonally sadistic it is.. Than society to keep on playing make believe that they have control over themselves or fate and that they are secure blames them calls them crazy or whatever and rejects them.

I am worried that not only the POD people are basically suicidal deep deep down in some part of the so called collective consciousness.

I have seen animals kill themselves, no other way to explain it.

Life hurts.Pod people don't make it better,to be here,but neither do pathological pronoid optimists who so desperately want to think the world is good and just.So desperate they are they will tell victims of this worlds cruelty that they CHOOSE to be born.

I never chose to be born I just came,into this place, I hate it here,it reeks of death and screams in pain,there is no reason for it, no excuse it just is and I do not like it. Life is chaos it and it hurts my heart to see it in it's entirety,all the blood cries waste and suffering along side joys that do not last. Unlike some, I have no choice but to see it all the conflicting the exuberant innocence torn asunder,because I saw too much of life too early and when I try to pretend I can't see it,I hurt worse. I hate this world, this frail pain racked body sucks, it's limitedness it's frailty , it's terrible vulnerability,I never asked for this. This death, this pain, this fleeting warmth that fades too fast and all these little deaths inside I die everyday, just by knowing how the world is and knowing that for humanity to change it, for real may not be possible,in these bodies, with the limits we face, in life itself. Maybe we might be able to fix our society but we'd have to find a permanent lasting and foolproof way top detect get rid of or change the personalities of the toxic people living among us, the psychopath, the narcissist, the authoritarian, the bully, the exploiter, the con man..and make sure these personalities will not come to any place of power again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I hear what you said. So, you don't think that even in America in, say, 1980, that...
people had some kind of shelter against the insanity that constantly stalks us?

I mean, just before Reagan got in, before they starting gutting the middle class completely, before they starting throwing half the ghetto in jail, wasn't there some safety in America?

Things were still relatively cheap. The environment was cleaner than it had been. The power of segregation had been broken. The anti-abortion crowd was still disorganized, and the E.R.A. was still a possibility.

I grant you that the rest of the world was the worse for our anti-Communist slaughter (e.g., The Shock Doctrine victims). I grant you that there was already stagflation. But, it sure didn't feel as insane and desperate in America then as it does today.

Also, today, isn't there some safety in Europe, which seems to have learned something from the two World Wars?

It has always seemed to me that material well-being is at least a palliative, if not a cure, for the disease that you describe. We had the opportunity to make a sustainable society, using population planning and lower consumption. But, I agree with you that that opportunity was trampled by the right as soon as Reagan got in.

I don't want to argue about how hopeless it is or isn't. I just want to get a baseline on what you think is possible. My guess is that you haven't totally given up or you wouldn't take the trouble to post here.

arendt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. My idea isn't easy it may shock or it might make sense.
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 03:40 PM by undergroundpanther
>So, you don't think that even in America in, say, 1980, that...
>people had some kind of shelter against the insanity that constantly >stalks us?

Some did some did not. In the 80's there was more equal distribution of wealth but on the flip side there was those who were denied it,there was alot of issues in the 80's like, religious right's satanism scare,the fact was for the poor and those in hospitals,they were turned out on the street,there was alot of disdain for the poor in America yet in the popular media there was a hullabaloo for feed the world and hands across America . It was alot of show but where the rubber meets the road it was close to the same old thing, very little to help the most desperate and suffering.

>I mean, just before Reagan got in, before they starting gutting the >middle class completely, before they starting throwing half the ghetto >in jail, wasn't there some safety in America?

Yes up to a point. Depends on where you were located at back than. When the hippie movement got infiltrated and shut down by the government,it was a tragedy,for it was the government and the authoritarian personalities within it who saw the freedom of the 60's as a threat. The neo cons still harp about those dirty hippies on the right. On the right they saw hippies as a counter-culture that threatened their cultural hegemony/empire at it's roots, it's social domination of culture. Empires cannot tolerate an alternative cultures to empire existing near the empire.Because the rulers know most people do not like living under someones boot, they'd rather be respected, free and loved as a worthy human part of a whole..


So there was government/corporate psyops,cointelpro, etc.There was trauma to remind people behind this shell of a democracy are guns(kent state)and we are not free. So all that hope turned inward with the eeexxxpand your mind bullshit, new age tripe,and drugs like LSD .The notion of a viable counter community to escape the sick stifling authoritarian culture of normal-land was abandoned and what survived afterward became the "Me Generation" that voted in reagan..and they turned away from the dream, and so did the culture at large,turning away from freedom for maybe they thought the price for it was too steep..

In the 70's things were not so stable ,there was the gas shortages,I remember people fighting at the pumps for gas,with their kids in the car.In the 70's there were food shortages too.riots etc.
It has NEVER really been all that stable or free here in America,depending on how you look at it,that is a nostalgia trap.
Freedom died when America was colonized.

>Things were still relatively cheap. The environment was cleaner than it >had been.

Silent Spring was written in the late sixties and pollutants like DDT were used all the time in the 70's,and there were other toxic wastes,I think the difference was it had not reached the saturation point on this earth yet,like it is doing now.

>The power of segregation had been broken.
>The anti-abortion crowd was still disorganized, and the E.R.A. was still >a possibility.

Yes and it took tremendous organizing on many levels to create these things, and time too. There are some simple things that have altered culturally the way real life changes in a society occur forever.

I suggest one of the insignificant monkey wrenches was the availability of home air conditioning to the middle and lower classes.Before air conditioning neighbors would on hot summer days go outside and socialize with each other after work.Kids played outside and the suburbs were not the little manicured islands with no signs of life except for the flicker of tv screens they are nowadays.

Another change was the corporate push to longer work hours appealing.The 24 hour open store. The need for traveling from place to place after work,and latchkey kids.
Longer work hours meant people came home too tired to cook a family dinner,people were too tired to go out and socialize with neighbors after work,longer work hours and cuts in pay and benefits damaged the grass roots connections between neighbors,As did families moving from town to town as the parents pursued jobs,they never had a chance to bond to the places and people where they lived.
Latchkey kids were admonished to not trust strangers and to stay inside the house where it is safe.

All this"prosperity" over time caused some social/ emotional damage,as Tv got more violent and the news turned into 24 hours people began to isolate and get turned on inside their own heads and homes and real life connections between people faded and the art of socialization was lost.I guess it was hard for humanity to face up to the fact that freedom from authoritarians and elitist fucks is won often by your blood being shed,and blood of your fellows , literally.Pacifism did not work. Ghandi was murdered,so much for that. I guess the reality of what kind of monsters we are up against and have been up against for so long,was overwhelming to contemplate even with all the material things that made the 70's look so stable compared to now.

>I grant you that the rest of the world was the worse for our >anti-Communist slaughter (e.g., The Shock Doctrine victims). I grant you that there was already stagflation. But, it sure didn't feel as insane
>and desperate in America then as it does today.

I know, I feel that way too I think it is an illusion tho. I think partly for me since there was no internet, I got my news from the same sources everyone else did.And so I never saw how bad it really was.So maybe ignorance was bliss.Also my body was younger,and I wasn't in pain and the medical issues were not making my life harder,I was going through psych shit,but that's a whole other ball of wax.

>Also, today, isn't there some safety in Europe, which seems to have >learned something from the two World Wars?

The generations closer to the war learned it. But every generation that grows up not experiencing how bad it was,or who are not able to empathize with those times and thus can forget, there is danger there. Today jokes are made about the holocaust, those jokes said in say 1959 would have pissed off alot of people.We have become so desensitized .Also Margret Thatcher did alot of damage to the equality that threatened European elitists.Thatcher and her supporters wanted to return the balance of power between the rich and the poor to that which existed before the post WWII reforms, the rich the authoritarian,the corporate.

>It has always seemed to me that material well-being is at least a >palliative, if not a cure, for the disease that you describe. We had the >opportunity to make a sustainable society, using population planning and >lower consumption. But, I agree with you that that opportunity was >trampled by the right as soon as Reagan got in.

A palliative is not a cure, it's a band aid on a sucking chest wound. Sadly for some a little bit of palliative creates an addiction,a greed to acquire more and more that cannot ever be satiated.Even if Reagan never got in,there will always be the manipulating selfish psychopathic assholes that want more than everyone else has and will take it from others and scheme and ruin the peace of others just because they can.
These personality types " parasitic alpha pigs" are the problem.

>I don't want to argue about how hopeless it is or isn't. I just want to >get a baseline on what you think is possible. My guess is that you >haven't totally given up or you wouldn't take the trouble to post here.

True.But my solution might not be easy, tidy,pleasant,or surgical, it might be very messy and take alot of guts and intelligence and a few bad mistakes ,it will take alot of education, to teach people how to not tolerate abuse and to recognize it.To admit certain toxic personalities do not change,nor do they want to.. they are what they are and we cannot live around them or tolerate them if we want freedom,sharing, peace and equality to be our future.

First we must STOP child abuse,that includes spanking and parents dominating kids and talking to them like dogs. Parents that teach through domination and fear are teaching kids to dominate so others will do what they say out of fear or guilt.Training their kids to be hypocrite bullies

We have to create havens,out of our homes, make them be asshole free zones where sensitive and wounded souls can go to learn to trust again,and fight the very types of people that broke them.We need to become self sufficient as possible, that is, learn everything we can learn that can sustain us, from how to build a solar panel,to home medical care to sewing our own clothes and canning.. and share our skills with others for FREE.
We have to learn to share what we have and let it go with no strings.We need to create a gift economy.One that does not need money or banks to get things people need to them.
t-economy.com/
We need to become smaller, big huge impersonal empires do not serve the needs of people at all. Breaking up into smaller groupings would be better because power would be close to each member,reachable and accountable..We need to be tribal again.(not necessarily primitive)
http://www.newtribalventures.com/NTV/

We have to accept to protect a viable cooperative community that can get along we have to also accept we must not tolerate authoritarians, psychopaths and toxic personalities and we must reject the philosophies they espouse as self serving socially destructive bullshit.We cannot by-stand when others are hurt or deprived or bullied anymore.We need to be there for each other,even if it risks our own self. We need to care to speak to each other with respect,listen empathize with others..And do it up to a point..and that point is reached when one deals with a toxic personality,a person with NO consience..These cold blooded charmers are not capable or willing to live and let live any where they are and these toxic persons will not do their part and share in a community ,so we have to learn how to detect them, reject them limit their freedom ,restrain them from gaining any social clout,wealth,power position or too much privacy while in the community and if necessary destroy them and move on...
http://www.ponerology.com/
This is how some tribes maintained such peaceful egalitarian ethics.
They kill the "alpha urges and if failing to curb that they kill the alphas " people who abuse people and power, and take too much from others.

an egalitarian band of hunter-gatherers that deliberately excludes any alpha role and makes its decisions by consensus. Along with tribes, which are larger and more recent but politically similar, these bands are so deeply committed to egalitarianism that their leadership is never very strong, let alone coercive. Yet they govern themselves rather well in the absence of formal institutions.

Yet sadly they have no defense against 'alphas',and so the 'alphas' destroy them.

We as people need to learn how to BE the alphas for ourselves,and not bow down or react in ways of obedience or by-standing when encountering a toxic personality in our midst. After dispatching the toxic asshole we must than go back to being EQUALS with everyone else in the community who isn't a toxic personality. Each member of said culture has to SHIFT between these two 'roles' of equal among equals and alpha among alphas That ability to detect discern who is a toxic danger socially,and as individuals each must be able and willing to take control of the threat,and let go of that control once the threat has been nullified,go back to egalitarian and consensus .Each person living in an asshole free zone must learn to shift between these two poles. That kind of flexibility can create the kind of culture we long for, yet still defend it from those capricious greedy bullies who would destroy it,exploit it, and dominate it..
Because if an abuser comes into our community or wheedles in,a thug, a salesman of bad ideas,a so called 'leader".Repeatedly there are certain signs a person is not a community oriented kind of person.
To have a safe and egalitarian community it requires each person in the community to trust themselves to act and do without a leader on the outside taking away the responsibility from them.They must not by-stand and on top of that each must be able to be an alpha and say to this thug, Enough,is enough and be strong enough in trusting themselves to destroy the threat by whatever means stops the threat to the community's well being.People need to understand what abuse is and what it is not.And once they understand what abuse is to NOT tolerate it.

We are all kings, each of us unique yet we are all equal too.For this good kind of society to survive each person in it must have an inner locus of control of their own, not an outside one. An outside locus of control is the thing in people that impulses them, to not trust their own senses, it relies on leaders, experts and other symbolic authorities to tell them right from wrong , to give permission,and to suspend responsibility,when in reality any so called authority or chain of command cannot suspend an individuals responsibility for what they do,yet people suspend responsibility for authority way too much,we have been conditioned by trauma and by this top down hierarchical culture to behave that way...and it is killing us all.

http://www.noogenesis.com/malama/nvc/domination.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Thanks. There's a lot to digest there. Links to read, etc...
Plus, its a little off my original topic, namely, framing the POD for what it is.

And, as you say, what you are proposing isn't easy. Given the perilous situation we are in right now (Iran, Depression, martial law, oil crisis, all dialed-in and ready to launch), I'm not sure how what you want can happen in time.

Its way easier to destroy than to create, especially when the tools used to defend against destruction of society have been captured by the destroyers.

So, give me some time.

Thanks for your lengthy and thought-provoking responses.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. All of this makes a great deal of sense
and is a truly revolutionary proposal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bedtime for me. Really hope someone would like to use this idea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Congrats on seeing the Fundamentalists for what they are
but I will just add that this also applies to some Eastern Religions (Budhism comes to mind and I know that surprises people) That is why we need to realize that this is also a fight between those who are rational and those who choose irrationality

That is the anti intellectuals (and that is not a frame I recommend)

POD works for me, and sadly none in the Democratic Party will use it. At times I wonder if this is Stockholm syndrome or just plain out cowardice

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Authors keep rediscovering the constellation of fundamentalist pathologies...
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 07:26 AM by arendt
but it never sticks in the public's mind. I wonder why? :sarcasm:

How many times do these people get a chance to murder, enslave, and torment people with their pathetic shtick before we wise up? Time has just about run out for America and the planet thanks to these death-worshiping hypocrites.

I think, at minimum, to survive we will somehow need to pass a version of "secularization" like the Europeans have - NO tax breaks or legal breaks AT ALL for religions. Treat them like businesses. Same laws, same everything.

We might further consider banning fundamentalism, the same way the Germans have banned Nazism. The Germans have laws about Nazi paraphenalia. It would be difficult to separate fundamentalism from Christianity, but I think we might find a few decidedly anti-Christian features at the core which we could ban. Like advocacy of murder and torture, for instance.

I just keep hitting this note. It seems to be my vocation.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Chris Hedges on “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War On America”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thanks for the URLs. No time to post links, but...
"American Theocracy" - Kevin Phillips.

"The Republican War on Science" - Chris? Mooney

"The Age of American Unreason" - Susan Jacobi

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks. Was aware of Kevin Phillips
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. I like George Carlin's definition of "bi-partisan;"
"A larger than usual deception is being carried out against the American public."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. Front page kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. Kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick.
I don't understand DU.

This got 15 recs between 10 PM and midnight.
Then it got not a single post all day today.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. Gary Schmitt. Daniel Pipes. The list of the men behind the curtains goes on and on...
Edited on Mon Mar-31-08 06:51 PM by BeHereNow
Thanks Arendt.
It is always a happy day when I tune into DU
and find another 5 star post from you.
Especially after wading through the American Idol political blathering.
:thumbsup: :yourock: :hug:
BHN
On edit- K&R!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Hi, BNH - nice to see you...
so, do you think this frame can be hung on the POD?

I was thinking about starting a daily listing, calling it "Death Watch". With a weekend summary, called "This Week in Death" - a takeoff on TDS's "This Week in God".

What do you think?

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Absolutely. We've got the stock market watch, why not the POD watch as well.
Wouldn't be at all surprised to find that they are connected.
Maybe we should set up a comparative graph...

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Kick
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. Wish I could rec this! I agree with it all with the exception of the Obama comments.
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 04:35 PM by TheGoldenRule
I've found Obama questionable because he is a corporatist. That he did not denounce his pastor years ago, is telling and leads me to believe that he is part of the POD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC