Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prosecutor says he was fired because he refused to "play ball" with the GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 12:59 PM
Original message
Prosecutor says he was fired because he refused to "play ball" with the GOP
Yep, looks like there's nothing to this US Attorney firing thing.

Paul Kiel told you yesterday about New Mexico US Attorney David Iglesias who said his firing was a "political fragging" and that he was holding a press conference today.

Here's McClatchy just out on some of what he said ...

The U.S. attorney from New Mexico who was recently fired by the Bush administration said Wednesday that he believes he was forced out because he refused to rush an indictment in an ongoing probe of local Democrats a month before November's Congressional elections.

David Iglesias said two members of Congress separately called in mid October to inquire about the timing of an ongoing probe of a kickback scheme and appeared eager for an indictment to be issued on the eve of the elections in order to benefit the Republicans. He refused to name the members of Congress because he said he feared retaliation.

Two months later, on Dec. 7, Iglesias became one of six U.S. attorneys ordered to step down for what administration officials have termed "performance-related issues." Two other U.S. attorneys also have been asked to resign.

Iglesias, who received a positive performance review before he was fired, said he suspected he was forced out because of his refusal to be pressured to hand down an indictment in the ongoing probe.

"I believe that because I didn't play ball, so to speak, I was asked to resign," said Iglesias, who officially stepped down Wednesday.



You still think Carol Lam wasn't fired because she pushed the Duke-Wilkes-Foggo probe too far?


http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/012701.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have mixed feeling on this... While what was done IMHO was
wrong. All these people were Political Appointments in the first place and could be asked to resign at the request of the President...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Judges are also appointments by the president too...
... but that responsibility also carries more responsibility than just doing the president's bidding too. Though the hiring and firing of Attorney's is an executive function, we should remember who they are there to serve, and it is NOT only to serve Bush, I don't care what sort of B.S. is used to rationalize this! This is WHY these bums need to be impeached!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. BUT new appointments are supposed to go through the senate. What is new here
is a clause in the new partriot act which says gonzalez can go around the senate. If these firings/hirings went through the senate, they might not have been accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. political firings would NOT have been accepted...
that's why we require Senate approval... we live in ugly times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. two things -- important things
first, the appointmenrts AND the performance is supposed to be nonpartisan and

second, the appointments used to go thru Senatorial confirmation -- recent legislation Bush requested changed that. Now they're abusing it.

Another point I'll throw in: the reason the appointments are supposed to be both nonpartisan and go thru confirmation is so we have a robust and NOT politically-charged and obeiscant law enforcement structure.

What's happening is so wrong and so frightening on so many levels that I can't even remain articulate on the subject. I'm aghast and appalled -- and scared. You talk about fascism, baby, this is IT. This isn't creeping fascism, this is full blown fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. For all the caterwauling over activist judges, why is that term reserved
for instances where a judge upholds the law and Constitution over evangelicals' desire to impose their interpretation of law? Why isn't it considered judicial activism when the GOP tries to politicize law enforcement? Rhetorical question, but I agree with you that we are well past the "creeping" stage. Funny how the same people have been such consistent players in the transformation of our country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtimecanuk Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Question for the Lawyers out there... Do any of these Lawyers...
have a case for wrongful dismissal law suites? In maybe answering my own question, most of them resigned I bet huh?

ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. I dont think so
Im not a lawyer, but AFIK, you only have a case for wrongful dismissal if you were fired because of race, religion, gender, age, or handicap. Anything else falls under "at will employment".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Republicans = Nazis. You vill do it our vey... n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. ... wrong thread. delete
Edited on Wed Feb-28-07 01:12 PM by kansasblue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. You do not cross Bush and Co.
They will put in party people good or bad. Did you see who they have put into head the Vets? A man who drags money from people. Just like the one that was running that out side part of Walter Reed. What a group of slimy people. Where have we heard about a political over view on everything? The one party state always does it. Lenin would be pleased with our govt. and how it is going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. More rethug dirty tricks in your face corruption...........
it will NEVER end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Need to keep supporting these folks coming forward and fighting the good fight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Republicans didn't push through the Patriot Act because they weren't planning on using it.
Edited on Wed Feb-28-07 02:09 PM by w4rma
The Patriot Act was the Enabling Act that they had been planning to pull out when they had enough power to prevent the undoing of their pet law.

Instead, they are now having to use their pet law to keep themselves out of prison for breaking our laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. it would most likely be Repugs on the Judiciary Committee -- here you go:
my money is on John Kyl of Arizona and John Cornryn of Texas.



Arlen Specter
RANKING MEMBER, R-PENNSYLVANIA


Orrin G. Hatch
R-UTAH


Charles E. Grassley
R-IOWA


Jon Kyl
R-ARIZONA


Jeff Sessions
R-ALABAMA


Lindsey Graham
R-SOUTH CAROLINA


John Cornyn
R-TEXAS


Sam Brownback
R-KANSAS


Tom Coburn
R-OKLAHOMA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. I hope people keep speaking up like this. They are brave
and we need to find a way to thank them for helping us save what remains of our "justice" system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. Tom Deeelay tought his minions well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC