Dan Abrams show THE VERDICT. He's supposed to be an attorney and yet, not one word
from him regarding the series of "torture" memo's etc., in the last few days. Never even mentions that top White House and DOJ attorney's actually went to Guantanamo, observed the torture and made recommendations for additional "techniques". Instead he chooses to rate candidates gaffs and prattle on and on about the same old campaign crap. I find this new format insipid and boring. Can't believe he is Elliot Abrams' son. Obviously not a very astute attorney. What a waste of air time.
6. In all fairness...the show is called "Verdict," not THE Verdict.
Dan explained why before the first show aired. "The Verdict" sounded as if it would be just a courtroom or legal show. It isn't. He wanted the freedom to discuss anything and everything without being tied to talking about "the verdict" of specific cases.
Maybe lame, and maybe (probably) you're right that he should be talking about bigger, more important issues. But he did qualify the name precisely because he thought the THE made it sound too much like a court/legal show.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.