|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-05-08 11:52 PM Original message |
Computer Taught To Recognize Attractiveness In Women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yawn -- I can already do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 02:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Hmmm passive aggressive. Well, I mean, if that's what you want to think about women go ahead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 02:41 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Um...why is my computer beeping? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
2. I wonder if the "Golden Ratio" is part of the programming. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
3. How interesting that a similar study was not done on men's faces. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DavidDvorkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 12:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. You may be jumping to a false conclusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 02:33 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. "Positions"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 02:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. I believe the choice to start with women's face was more technical than sexist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-07-08 04:21 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Well, of course it makes sense to do with the least parameters, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-07-08 06:14 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Sadly, I doubt its mens faces that is more complicated-its that mens reactions are LESS complicated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DavidDvorkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
4. But this assumes that those parameters are what the humans were also using to judge beauty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 01:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Right. My first thought as well. Still..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 02:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Too bad beauty involves love and admiration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-07-08 04:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. And I have a handsome boyfriend, but the computer doesn't give a fig! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beregond2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
6. well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
7. Then it should also be able to create the "most" attractive face possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-07-08 05:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. The "ape" in us wants to see the most attractive female face! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-06-08 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
8. still GIGO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC