Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army recruits requiring waivers for misconduct more than doubled since 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:06 AM
Original message
Army recruits requiring waivers for misconduct more than doubled since 2004
More Army recruits require waivers
Percentage with conduct history doubles since '04

By Jim Michaels
USA TODAY


WASHINGTON — The percentage of recruits requiring a waiver to join the Army because of a criminal record or other past misconduct has more than doubled since 2004 to one for every eight new soldiers.

The increase reflects the difficulties the Army faces in attracting young men and women into the military at a time of war. "Each month is a struggle, for the Army in particular," said Bill Carr, a top military personnel official.

The percentage of active and Reserve Army recruits granted "conduct" waivers for misdemeanor or felony charges increased to 11% last fiscal year from 4.6% in fiscal 2004, according to Army Recruiting Command statistics. So far this fiscal year, which began last October, 13% of recruits have entered the Army with conduct waivers.

Most waivers involve misdemeanors. The Army has granted 4,676 conduct waivers among the 36,047 recruited from October through late February. The waivers have helped the Army meet its active and Reserve recruitment goals of about 100,000 people a year for the past several years.

A recruit needs a waiver if he or she has one felony or serious misdemeanor or more than three minor misdemeanors. For example, a single charge of possessing marijuana or driving under the influence requires a waiver. Minor infractions include disorderly conduct, trespassing or vandalism.

more...

http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080407/1a_bottomstrip07.art.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Imagine being an Afghan or Iraqi and having armed convicted criminals come to keep the peace
Not a pretty picture.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So much for Army standards; yes, the military does seem to be broken. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disorientedx3 Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "convicted criminals"?
more like young persons convicted of a one time lapse.. but then again, I'd bet a large number of DU'ers have a misdemeanor or two as well. And most of us could be trusted with the job. Its not like the army is waiving murders and drug dealers into the ranks. The real criminals are the "deciders" at the top. One particular decider comes to mind.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They can die in Iraq but they can't vote in Florida. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Now there's a good point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC