Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran attack?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:58 AM
Original message
Iran attack?
I do not believe the US will in the end attack Iran, the co-sponsor of the Iraqi puppet regime. Among the elites the consensus is clearly against that particular insanity.

Then again, they too can be shocked and awed by a small faction, for example by a staged terror event. In the end I don't see Brzezinski and the CFR, no matter how much they know, standing up and declaring, "April 31st* was an inside job!"**

If the US attacks Iran, it may set off World War III, in part depending on the form of the attack. As we know, all the US really has left for an attack is millions of tons of bombs, and whatever exotic weapons they hope to test. These include the "small" nukes that Cheney and Rumsfeld so ached to employ against hard targets (they may indeed have done so in Afghanistan). It may also set off a Stalingrad for US forces in the Middle East. The aircraft carriers, the Gulf bases and obviously the ground troops in Iraq are all vulnerable and surrounded.

Short of revolution in the US (the opposite of popular fascist reaction seems more likely to me) one can't imagine a ceasefire, orderly withdrawal, apologies and tribunals to follow. If American casualties are high, the regime will raise the stakes and raise again until the world backs down in terror, or until it's World War III.

Assuming anything is still standing after the resolution of the immediate hostilities, the new Cold War would follow. EU, Russia, China and pretty much everyone else would join in a front to contain the US. The dollar would fall to pennies on the euro. The US would enter Great Depression times three, probably retreat from its forward positions around the world and turn completely fascist at home. Don't bet on an election in 2008.

This sucky horror scenario brought to you by Hubris and Halliburton International.

---

* Yes, that's intentional! Reverse voodoo, okay?

** Then again, I did see a chastened Tucker Carlson last night, newly demoted to "2008 Elections Correspondant," pretend he thought the Iraq invasion was a mistake. Whore. (The pretend part applies to the word "thought.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick for readers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC