Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karl Rove's Awkward Moment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:29 AM
Original message
Karl Rove's Awkward Moment
Former White House chief strategist Karl Rove wasn't clapping when Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo was given the "Blogger of the Year" award (in absentia) at The Week magazine's Opinion Awards dinner at the Four Seasons hotel Tuesday night.

Marshall won the award for his relentless coverage of the U.S. attorneys firings scandal -- and the White House's behind-the-scenes role in the firings.

Since Rove himself was accused of having a role in the firings, the moment was a bit awkward.

Marshall, who also won a George Polk Award for his work on the story, posted thousands of internal Justice Department e-mails and memos on his blog, which became mandatory reading for anyone following the unfolding scandal.

Just as Marshall was being extolled Tuesday night, Rove, who was subpoenaed by the Senate during the height of the brouhaha, was overheard saying, "There wasn't a shred of evidence in those documents."

Of course, we don't know whether he was referring to the Justice Department documents (that were released publicly) or all those missing White House e-mails, which, by the way, are still M.I.A.

We'll let you know when we hear back from Rove, who we e-mailed earlier for comment.

Rove sure was busy Tuesday night. He also appeared on The O'Reilly Factor doing his best impersonation of Bill Clinton.

For more on The Week awards ceremony, and Rove's role as a panelist on the magazine's panel, check outReason magazine's Web site.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/04/karl_roves_awkward_moment.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. "There wasn't a *shred* of evidence in those documents"
Edited on Thu Apr-10-08 09:31 AM by ck4829
Freudian slip alert!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. the statement isn't exactly a denial of wrongdoing, either
He's just saying he covered his tracks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. He left off "that will see the light of day"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. lurking behind the scenes and through the corridors of Fox News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC