Cringetastic Scientific American interview with "Expelled" producer Mark Mathis.

[slowry]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyKCzoikh7k&feature=PlayList&p=F98112EA78C119BB&index=0 (part 1 of 8)
or at sciam:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-conversation-with-mark-mathis

80 unedited and almost unbearable minutes. Enjoy(???).

[ColbertWatcher]

1. Scientific American interviewed this idiot?

Time to cancel my subscription.

[Tesha]

2. Try "New Scientist" instead.

Try New Scientist instead.

http://www.newscientist.com/home.ns

Or go for the real tough road and read Science. ;)

http://www.sciencemag.org/

Tesha

[girl gone mad]

3. the journal Nature is better, imo..

but if one is just seeking a general "layman's" magazine, I think Popular Science is alright.

[Tesha]

4. How's your French?

Science et Avenir is way better than Popular Science.

http://sciencesetavenirmensuel.nouvelobs.com/hebdo/parution/p734/



Tesha

[slowry]

5. They explain their reasoning behind it, in another article, fairly convincingly imho.

And to be fair, they absolutely tear him into pieces. I'm not a reader of theirs though, so I can't vouch for the rest of their output.