Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chairman Conyers Deeply Troubled by FBI Juror Interviews in Cyril Wecht Mistrial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 05:17 PM
Original message
Chairman Conyers Deeply Troubled by FBI Juror Interviews in Cyril Wecht Mistrial
Edited on Fri Apr-11-08 05:30 PM by RamboLiberal
Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers released the following statement in response to reports today that the FBI is attempting to interview jurors in the Cyril Wecht mistrial:

I am deeply troubled by reports of FBI agents contacting former jurors who failed to convict Dr. Wecht. Whether reckless or intended, it is simply common sense that such contacts can have a chilling effect on future juries in this and other cases. When added to the troubling conduct of this prosecution, there is the appearance of a win at all costs mentality. The committee continues to investigate this matter.

FBI Contacts Jurors After Wecht Mistrial
WTAE TV - April 11, 2008

Two jurors in Dr. Cyril Wecht’s federal trial told WTAE Channel 4’s news exchange partner, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, that the FBI wants to talk with them.

U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab declared a mistrial after the Wecht jury said it was deadlocked on Tuesday. A new trial for the ex-Allegheny County coroner is scheduled for next month.

Two of the deadlocked jurors said the FBI called them this week and asked for interviews.

U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan’s office said it’s common for an investigating agency to call jurors when a case ends in a deadlock. Margaret Philbin, a representative for Buchanan, said the FBI was simply setting up appointments so prosecutors could discuss the case with the jurors.

http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=1280

A spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney's Office in Pittsburgh tells the paper that prosecutors just wanted to chat about the case with the jurors, a "commonplace" practice. The FBI agents were simply setting up the appointments. It is true that it's commonplace for lawyers from both sides to speak to jurors after a trial to get feedback. But there are two important distinctions here.

First, prosecutors didn't seek to poll or speak to jurors before making their determination as to whether to retry the case. If they had, the jurors would have said that most of them were ready to vote to acquit. "That seemed to us to be vindictive," Dick Thornburgh, the former attorney general under President George H.W. Bush and a lawyer for Wecht, told me. "It's how have behaved the whole case." The jury foreman has even said that the prosecution seemed "politically driven." (See our rundowns of the case here and here.)

And second, using the FBI to contact jurors is far from commonplace (Jerry McDevitt, another of Wecht's attorneys, told me that the agent who'd contacted the jurors was not even the agent who had worked on the Wecht case). Thornburgh told me that it was "unprecedented" in his experience. A former federal prosecutor told the Tribune-Review that it was unusual. And a veteran defense attorney from the Pittsburgh area told the paper that he'd never heard of such a thing. And there's a reason:

"If I'm a prospective juror in the second trial, and I'm hearing stories that if I don't agree with the government that I might get calls from the FBI, that could have a very, very deleterious impact," said. "I would think that's very bothersome to have that happen."

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/fbi_agents_contacted_wecht_jur.php



Being discussed in Pittsburgh as a total outrage by Bushbot Repuke US Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan - she who went after and convicted Tommy Chong for selling bongs on the internet - yeah that made us all safer. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. After a jury is deadlocked and dismissed. What is there to talk about?
Edited on Fri Apr-11-08 05:23 PM by Wizard777
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am deeply troubled that Conyers has not actually DONE anything useful against the bush gang
except mouth off, posture, and pretend to be tough. where are the subpoenas, where are the contempt charges, where are the .... hell anything that is more than just phony hot air fraudulating on his part.

the democrats in congress are still afraid of the big bad bush and his dick, cheney.

Msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And Ditto!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. They certainly do get persnickety when
things don't quite go the way they had intended. Makes me feel good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Conyers Deeply Troubled"?
That poor, poor man, bless his heart. How will he ever sleep tonight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC