Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McClatchy: Compensation for 'bumped' airline passengers to double

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 02:37 PM
Original message
McClatchy: Compensation for 'bumped' airline passengers to double
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/33931.html

Compensation for 'bumped' airline passengers to double
By Dave Montgomery | McClatchy Newspapers

* Posted on Wednesday, April 16, 2008


WASHINGTON — Airlines will be required to double the maximum compensation they pay passengers involuntarily bumped from scheduled flights under measures announced Wednesday by the Department of Transportation.

Under the new rule, which takes effect next month, fliers will receive up to $400 if they're rescheduled to reach their destination within two hours of their original arrival time or four hours for international flights. The fee would increase to a maximum of $800 if passengers aren't rerouted within that time frame.

The current limits are $200 and $400.

Airlines sometimes are forced to bump passengers on oversold flights. In announcing the changes in advance of the summer travel season, Transportation Secretary Mary Peters said the rule will ensure that fliers "are more fairly reimbursed for their inconvenience."

The rule also extends the scope of the bumping fee to more flights, including aircraft seating at least 30 passengers. Current bumping regulations cover aircraft with 60 or more seats.

Peters also announced measures to help curb summertime delays, particularly in the perpetually congested New York area. Airliners will be allowed to use new alternative routes to avoid severe weather; those in the New York corridor could have the option of flying into Canadian airspace if necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. shouldn't they have a mandatory minimum instead of a maximum?
"we'd LOVE to give you $1000 for your seat, but we're prohibited from doing so by law..." :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC