Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Banished by Jeffs, ex-FLDS father hopes to get custody of his YFZ ranch kids.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 04:51 PM
Original message
Banished by Jeffs, ex-FLDS father hopes to get custody of his YFZ ranch kids.
http://www.abc4.com/mostpopular/story.aspx?content_id=c7ea64a0-da1b-4f62-a73f-cd5d024922f8

Sterling Harker couldn't believe it. He was following news coverage on the internet of the raid of the YFZ Ranch and there she was: Phyllis. She was decrying the raid that took all 416 children from the polygamous community. Phyllis is Sterling's ex-wife. She and at least two of their children - both girls and both minors - were living at the ranch. He had no idea. He remembered, "She was bawling and pleading her case. I guess I should have been more sensitive, but I thought, what goes around comes around. She's crying; I cried. It's hard on her; it was hard on me."

With his daughters caught in the child custody mess in Texas, Sterling represents another class of parent that may have to be given standing in the court that ultimately decides the fate of the 416 children being held by Texas Child Protective Services. It's not just the people on the ranch who have a stake in what happens to the children. There in fact be several men from Colorado City who's families were taken away and sent to Texas.

Back in the late 90s, Sterling Harker made it known that he was opposed to marriages between underage girls and older men. He says that put him on Warren Jeffs' "blacklist." Jeffs would eventually take away his two wives and children and kick him out of the FLDS sect. "He just cuts people off," Sterling said. "No remorse, No consideration. Ruthless."

But with the state of Texas now in control, Sterling has at least a faint hope that he can get custody of his two youngest daughters, LaDonna, 13, and Shauna, 11. The child welfare system in Texas favors relatives over foster care as long as the children are kept from the abusive environment. Sterling still lives among the FLDS, but he no longer is a member of the sect. "All I can say is that I'm the biological father. I love my family. I have always loved them."

SNIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. and in texas, panhandle anyway. ... it does not automatically side with mother
i have seen three child custody and father has as much weight as mother, so that is good for him too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I know women whose chilren were awarded to their fathers
Edited on Fri Apr-18-08 05:12 PM by Warpy
and in each case, the women were fine parents. The children just voiced a request to go with Dad when the marriage broke up.

In all cases, she was still Mom and kept close contact with the kids. I contrast this with too many of my divorced male acquaintances who seem to feel that since the kids are out of sight, they can be put out of mind and haven't kept contact with them.

Yes, I know more dads who do keep contact with the kids after the divorce, but I know of only one woman who didn't, and there were drugs and an abusive boyfriend involved there. If she ever finds her way out of that situation, she'll quite likely go back to being Mom.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. He probably has a pretty good chance of getting them. There will
be tremendous pressure to place these kids with FAMILY, which is only right. I wish him luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. The have to do DNA tests on ALL the people to see just who is whom
of course there's been a lot of inbreeding, so even that might not be definitive.. there could be a ton of Cousin-Uncle-Daddies & Sister-Momma-Grandmas:eyes:

Regardless, those men should be prosecuted for sex-slave-imprisonment/brainwashing & pedophilia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. question - how do you live among them but not be in the cult?
no judging the guy - I just want to know how that works. anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I thought it strange, as well.
Those folks are flat-out weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. As I understand it,
in his area there isn't a single compound -- there are actual towns, that are heavily (but not exclusively) populated by sect members. And some former members of the sect have been able to get legal settlements with the UEP (the entity that manages the sect-owned land) to give them property when they voluntarily give up membership or are forced out.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC