Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Commanders Seeking to Widen Pakistan Attacks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 07:22 AM
Original message
U.S. Commanders Seeking to Widen Pakistan Attacks
U.S. Commanders Seeking to Widen Pakistan Attacks

By MARK MAZZETTI and ERIC SCHMITT
Published: April 20, 2008


WASHINGTON — American commanders in Afghanistan have in recent months urged a widening of the war that could include American attacks on indigenous Pakistani militants in the tribal areas inside Pakistan, according to United States officials.

The requests have been rebuffed for now, the officials said, after deliberations in Washington among senior Bush administration officials who fear that attacking Pakistani radicals may anger Pakistan’s new government, which is negotiating with the militants, and destabilize an already fragile security situation.

American commanders would prefer that Pakistani forces attack the militants, but Pakistani military operations in the tribal areas have slowed recently to avoid upsetting the negotiations.

Pakistan’s government has given the Central Intelligence Agency limited authority to kill Arab and other foreign operatives in the tribal areas, using remotely piloted Predator aircraft. But administration officials say the Pakistani government has put far greater restrictions on American operations against indigenous Pakistani militant groups, including one thought to have been behind the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto.

American intelligence officials say that the threat emanating from Pakistan’s tribal areas is growing, and that Pakistani networks there have taken on an increasingly important role as an ally of Al Qaeda in plotting attacks against American and other allied troops in Afghanistan, and in helping foreign operatives plan attacks on targets in the West. The officials said the American military’s proposals included options for limited cross-border artillery strikes into Pakistan, missile attacks by Predator aircraft or raids by small teams of C.I.A. paramilitary forces or Special Operations forces.

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/world/asia/20pstan.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cool!!!
Just what Obama wants to do! We're getting the jump!

What other sovereign nation can we attack???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why don't you educate yourself before
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 09:54 AM by babylonsister
making ignorant comments? If there was actionable info on (9/11) terrorists in Pakistan, he'd take action, unlike what the current admin has done. Do you have a problem with that? You sound like McCain.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/367/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What part of...
engaging in military operations inside a sovereign nation that has not given us permission to conduct those military operations do you not understand, sister?

You seem to think attacking some other nation or country is ok, as long as its Barack who suggests it!

Is that the case? So, why don't YOU educate yourself before you go off making ignorant OPs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If there's actionable intel that the AQ terrorists affiliated w/9-11
are anywhere, whomever is in charge will act. Bank on it. That's what should have been done in the first place.
And FTR, I didn't write the OP, the NYT's did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC