|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:45 AM Original message |
The Judge in the FLDS polygamist case displays ignorance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. Maybe she's afraid the nursing babies will return to their husbands? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. Maybe the women on the career track |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Or maybe she * * gasp * * doesn't even have any babies. Seems even at DU many just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I'm not assuming anything about the judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. This wil be a learning experience for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:11 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. You are making interesting assumptions about the judge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:16 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. In addition, there are social workers and attorneys representing each of these children. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:41 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I'm sure they are- This is all happening very quickly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. Why can't they just continue, mother and baby, under the supervision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. If she "hasn't birthed any babies" then maybe she should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
7. The judge seems to be saying that two wrongs make a right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
9. The waterboarding of the babies is a concern but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. It might be a matter of where to house them, logistics ect.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I suspect it is legal issues... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knitter4democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. I think you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. The moms have said they are willing to remain in state custody, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I'm guessing there's precedent that doesn't allow for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
13. "The judge said she would leave it up to CPS officials and the attorneys to work something out" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I think they'd still need her approval... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
15. The women are also suspects in the abuse, and therefore are also being removed from contact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
19. These religious freaks are going to use any issue available for sympathy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 11:08 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. And you couldn't be more clueless. CPS says it doesn't place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
20. It may be a case of logistics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knitter4democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
22. I don't think it was ignorance but practicality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. If the abuse they are suspected of is arranging for stat rape, still should be able to stay w/babes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knitter4democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. That's not the only abuse they're going after, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. I thought that was just a catch phrase for disciplining them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knitter4democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. No, it's no euphamism. He really did that to that baby. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
horseshoecrab (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Very complicated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knitter4democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
horseshoecrab (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
24. So what if she never nursed a baby? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Get a clue. The position of CPS is that they do not place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
horseshoecrab (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. They don't place adult women in foster care? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC