Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Col. Ann Wright: Is There an Army Cover Up of Rape and Murder of Women Soldiers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:37 PM
Original message
Col. Ann Wright: Is There an Army Cover Up of Rape and Murder of Women Soldiers?
Is There an Army Cover Up of Rape and Murder of Women Soldiers?
by Ann Wright


The Department of Defense statistics are alarming — one in three women who join the US military will be sexually assaulted or raped by men in the military. The warnings to women should begin above the doors of the military recruiting stations, as that is where assaults on women in the military begins — before they are even recruited.

But, now, even more alarming, are deaths of women soldiers in Iraq, and in the United States, following rape. The military has characterized each of the deaths of women who were first sexually assaulted as deaths from “non-combat related injuries,” and then added “suicide.” Yet, the families of the women whom the military has declared to have committed suicide, strongly dispute the findings and are calling for further investigations into the deaths of their daughters. Specific US Army units and certain US military bases in Iraq have an inordinate number of women soldiers who have died of “non-combat related injuries,” with several identified as “suicides.”

94 US military women in the military have died in Iraq or during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). 12 US Civilian women have been killed in OIF. 13 US military women have been killed in Afghanistan during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). 12 US Civilian women have been killed in Afghanistan.

Of the 94 US military women who died in Iraq or in OIF, the military says 36 died from non-combat related injuries, which included vehicle accidents, illness, death by “natural causes,” and self-inflicted gunshot wounds, or suicide. The military has declared the deaths of the Navy women in Bahrain that were killed by a third sailor, as homicides. 5 deaths have been labeled as suicides, but 15 more deaths occurred under extremely suspicious circumstances.

8 women soldiers from Fort Hood, Texas (six from the Fourth Infantry Division and two from the 1st Armored Cavalry Division) have died of “non-combat related injuries” on the same base, Camp Taji, and three were raped before their deaths. Two were raped immediately before their deaths and another raped prior to arriving in Iraq. Two military women have died of suspicious “non-combat related injuries” on Balad base, and one was raped before she died. Four deaths have been classified as “suicides.”

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/04/28/8564/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. obviously, yes.
I wonder at what we're NOT hearing about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. My husband and I were in tears watching a news report on this issue
the other night; I can't remember if it was CNN or MSNBC or maybe even HNN, sorry...
But it's just the most incredible SHIT ever, to think that this is the way our women in the military are being treated.
There are no words for how sick this makes me. And it's not that I'm painting all male members of the armed forces with the same broad brush; I'm sure this sickens and disgusts most of them as well...these could be their sisters, or mothers, or daughters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. What with waivers given to criminals to enlist, I don't doubt it.
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 01:03 PM by uppityperson
Military is giving waivers to people convicted not only of drug crimes, but violent ones and sex crimes. I was wrong. Steven Green's trial starts 4/27/09, not this week. He was one who was enlisted with a known record, given one of these waivers. k&r for FUBAR.


Edited to add link about his waiver:
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2006/07/sb-six-questions-eli-flyer
2. Don't the military services weed out applicants with criminal offense records who are more likely to get in trouble while on active duty?
Many applicants who are accepted for service have committed serious misdemeanors, and some even have felony convictions, even though the evidence is clear that these recruits are more likely than those with "clean" records to show be behavior problems while on active duty. To enlist with a conviction for a criminal offense, an applicant must receive a "moral" waiver. The process involved in issuing a waiver—evaluating reference recommendations for enlistment—is a weak one that has little value for screening purposes. It needs to be fixed. Since recruits who enlist with a moral waiver generally have higher discharge rates than other recruits, they should certainly receive more intensive screening for enlistment than they do now. A number of the men who have been accused of abuses against civilians in Iraq had histories that should have raised red flags. For example, former soldier Steven Green, who is accused of raping and killing an Iraqi girl and her family, enlisted with a moral waiver for at least two drug- or alcohol- related offenses. He committed a third alcohol-related offense just before enlistment, which led to jail time, though this offense may not have been known to the Army when he enlisted. News accounts say Green was a high school dropout (with a GED certificate) and suggest he was a seriously maladjusted young man. A limited background check during the recruitment process would likely have provided information showing he should not receive a moral waiver. (more@link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. So disturbing to have to K&R this.
I like to think of the word "recommend" as a positive thing. But this story is not positive, nor is it being reported in the CM, also not a positive thing. But our daughters, sisters and mothers should not be in danger from their co-workers, the men in uniform who are supposed to be "protecting" the country, as the women they're raping also signed up to do. The culture of war is unhealthy any way you look at it, there is nothing redeeming in the gross dehumanization of human beings by the military. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC