Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: ANWR oil would have little impact

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:28 AM
Original message
Study: ANWR oil would have little impact
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 10:37 AM by Texas Explorer

Opening an Alaska wildlife refuge to oil development would only slightly reduce America’s dependence on imports and would lower oil prices by less than 50 cents a barrel, according to an analysis released Tuesday by the Energy Department.

The report, issued by the Energy Information Administration, or EIA, said that if Congress gave the go-ahead to pump oil from Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the crude could begin flowing by 2013 and reach a peak of 876,000 barrels a day by 2025.

But even at peak production, the EIA analysis said, the United States would still have to import two-thirds of its oil, as opposed to an expected 70 percent if the refuge’s oil remained off the market.

-snip-

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4542853/


Here's more from EIA:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/analysis_publications/arctic_national_wildlife_refuge/html/analysisdiscussion.html

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/ogp/methodology.html

Considering the US uses 25 MILLION BARRELS OF OIL PER DAY, this would have little impact on reducing our foriegn oil dependence. He wants to drop protection for ANWR so they can profit from what's there because we have no other liquid oil reserves elsewhere in the US.

'Nuff said on ANWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree...case closed n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush is an utter shill for the petroleum industry and little else....
Well, a war criminal too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you! Great timing given that junior just declared lack of drilling in ANWR is responsible ...
... for the high oil prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. The CNN anchors were actually incredulous that he harped on that as solution
to all economic woes.

How ANWR has stayed unmolested through the Bush presidency is a wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. ANWR is more valuable as a wedge issue than as a business proposition.
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 10:37 AM by Junkdrawer
If Big Oil really wanted ANWR, they'd have had it on a silver platter long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Exactly
The oil barons know it's much easier and cheaper to deep drill the Gulf of Mexico than the frozen North Slope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. we wouldn't use the ANWR oil anyway, our refineries can't handle it
it would have to be sent to Asia to refine, we only can handle light sweet crude, which ANWR is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. ANWR is straw dog that distracts from the elephant in the room
The War and 20 years or more of a piss poor energy plan.
The Raygun regime dismantle Carter's energy plan which would have
set us free from the stranglehold of foreign interests of the middle east.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Leave the Caribou calving habitat alone. There's not much left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. 876,000 x $120 = $105 million per day
That's a pretty big impact for SOMEONE. Not for us peons, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. short-term profit ...
nothing else ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC