Agreed, and no one doubts that that I'm aware of. The only question is if each child and each parent had a fair hearing. True, they will all have individual hearings by June 5th, but it may be too late for some of them and that is tragic if they were not in any danger. Do you know of any studies that found foster care harmless?
In Texas compound case, 4 questions need answers
* Did Texas have any option short of taking the children from their families for weeks? This is the largest child custody case in Texas and U.S. history, and the seizure of so many children is both extreme and extraordinary. Authorities said they raided the compound — belonging to an isolationist group called the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS), which is known to practice polygamy — after a call to a domestic abuse hotline from a 16-year-old seeking help. The caller wasn't found, but child welfare officials said they saw several teenage girls who were pregnant or with young children. That prompted them to remove all the children.
But whether all were in danger isn't clear. The case is strong for adolescent girls, those at the highest risk of sexual or physical abuse. The FLDS, according to research by the attorneys general of Utah and Arizona and others, marries such girls to older men and encourages multiple wives as a way to heaven.
The justification is shakier for taking adolescent boys and prepubescent children away from their families. At the initial hearing last week, child welfare officials asserted that adolescent FLDS boys were being groomed as sexual predators. The boys are also at high risk of being banished from the group for minor infractions, giving older men more opportunity to have more wives.
Even so, the question has to be whether these practices are either illegal or so harmful they warranted abrupt, traumatic removal. Other courts have decided, for example, that even if parents encourage the use of marijuana, that is not grounds to remove children unless they help them buy the drug.
As for younger children, the widely applied standard in family law is to remove only those who appear to be in imminent danger. Testifying for the state at the initial hearing, child psychiatrist Bruce Perry said that in many ways, the environment at the ranch is healthy and the mothers loving, though "part of what they do is very destructive."
* Did the state infringe on the group's right to practice its religion? FLDS members have invited fear and suspicion by cutting themselves off from society. It is likely that the sect built its isolated West Texas compound in 2004 to avoid outside interference. In recent days, FLDS mothers have appeared on TV wearing prairie dresses and old-fashioned hairdos. Different, yes, but the Constitution protects religious freedom, as long as it's practiced legally.
* Did anyone inside the compound violate statutory rape, child molestation or other laws? Whatever the group's beliefs, the age of consent in Texas is 17, and the age of marriage with parental consent is 16. On TV, at least one FLDS man said he did not know Texas law prohibited sex with adolescent girls. If the law has been violated, the girls should be protected and offenders prosecuted.
* What is in the best interest of each child? What's right for one child might not be right for all 437. Appropriately, a judge has ordered that the case of each child be heard by June 5. DNA tests are being conducted to sort out tangled families. In the meantime, the emotional toll on the parents is evident. How the children are faring can only be guessed. They are being transferred to temporary foster care after being held in a coliseum in the town of San Angelo.
Texas appears to have made an admirable attempt to treat the children well despite the difficulty of coping with so many. But like other states, its foster care system is riddled with problems and, even if it weren't, it would be unsuitable for these circumstances.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20080424/cm_usatoday/intexascompoundcase4questionsneedanswers