Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Female Socialization: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:55 PM
Original message
Female Socialization: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers
Ebonya Washington, an economist at Yale, has a great paper that was just published in the American Economic Review called “Female Socialization: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers’ Voting on Women’s Issues.”

She looks at members in the House of Representatives and looks to see whether their voting patterns change. She provides interesting evidence that, “conditional on total number of children, each daughter increases a congress person’s propensity to vote liberally on reproductive rights issues.”

For example, looking at representatives with two children, she finds that N.O.W. (National Organization for Women) scores increase as the number of daughters increases:



Her regressions suggest that the effect runs primarily through the impact of daughters on fathers. Representatives who are mothers apparently don’t need any more “female socialization.”

This article got me to thinking about whether having kids impacts the electability of candidates.

More here: http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/kids-and-congress/

I downloaded the paper, haven't had a chance to read it yet though. Looks interesting. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm gonna K&R this
now off to read more and ponder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you love...
You are in my thoughts :hug:

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
18.  Thank you!! :)
:hug:

Backatcha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R. Important stuff. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. innerestin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting!
Thanks!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. So more daughters means
a man can come to understand how hard it is for women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm not sure that that's the exact conclusion...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's amazing how ignorant some men are of womens' bodily functions,
such as pregnancy, menstruation, and the effects of sexism such as unequal pay for equal work, lack of maternity/pregnancy leave, etc.

For example, Ron Paul says he has never seen a woman with a life-threatening pregnancy. This is statistically impossible. He is lying.

Ron Paul has been an OB-GYN in Lake Jackson, Texas (company town for Dow Chemical in Freeport) for about 35 years. In the sheer volume of patients he's had, he MUST have had patients with ectopic pregnancies, which are always life threatening, or extremely deformed fetuses who needed a late term abortion. Don't use the term "partial-birth abortion". The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists do not accept that as a medical term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cool.
Not surprising but always nice to see actual data
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Many good fathers thru the ages insisted their daughters be well-educated
(by private tutors if necessary) even well before it was socially acceptable to do so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, lemme tell ya first hand.....a lot of 'good fathers' give you the
good education and the Mercedes and all of the trappings.....so that you will be perceived as a "good catch" by one of the 'player's' sons *wink*wink* - it's really very sick. /eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Being a "good catch" hundreds of years ago had little to do
Edited on Mon May-05-08 10:27 PM by Lex
with being well-educated, if you were a woman.

Having powerful and moneyed men in the family was more important to be a "good catch."


Still, many fathers wanted their daughters to be well-educated for their own sakes.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. If you choose to believe that, okay.....I don't. Not in this patriarchal society, no.
Still, many fathers wanted their daughters to be well-educated for their own sakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Read and try to understand the OP
and you (maybe) will get the point.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, I just did. WTF?
But here’s a tougher question: Who has more kids — male or female members of the House?

There are lots of stories you could tell here. Professional women tend to have fewer kids than professional men (probably because a disproportionate burden of child rearing still falls upon them). But a counter hypothesis is that voters demand that women politicians have more kids (than they demand of male politicians).

Voters might demand that women politicians have more kids to prove that they are “real women” or that they will care about family issues. (To suggest that this is a possible voter preference is not to suggest that it is normatively attractive!) If the latter hypothesis is true, Chelsea Clinton’s status as a single child may....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Whose that guy marrying Jenna again?
He's gonna be a good little bushitler. Did gwb have any 'care' about giving his daughter away? And what's with "giving your daughter away, anway"?

Good riddance, *phew* she's 'gone'...what a burden.....she's someone else's problem now.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. I always hoped that my boss
had daughters....they were nicer to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
19. self delete
Edited on Tue May-06-08 05:24 AM by quantessd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC