Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another disgusting 'pundit' who has no business spewing shit on teevee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:58 PM
Original message
Another disgusting 'pundit' who has no business spewing shit on teevee
Michelle Bernard.



She sounds so reasonable. But when asked if she is fairly described as 'center right', she smiles oh so coyly and says, 'well ..... uh ..... yeeeees ..... '

But look what she does for a living. She's 'president' of the Independent Women's Forum, a group of moonbats founded by Ricky Silberman and Barbara Olson ............. You all know Olson, who was married to Ted Olson and who died on 9/11 on the plane that hit the Pentagon. Silberman, however, is even worse. her husband is that insane right winger, 'Judge' Larry Silberman. Read Blinded By The Right if none of this is making sense to you.

Anyway, back to Ms. Bernard. Why on EARTH is this woman asked back day after day after fucking day to diss every Dem in her oh-so-genteel way?

Fuck you, Chris Matthews, since you're the fuckwad who has her on every fucking day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. gahhhhhhhhhh!!
I thought she was creepy, but didn't know she was a Scaifette.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. You sure she isn't the Obama girl in disguise?
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danieljay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its the Chris Matthews drool factor that brings her back. Thats all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notfullofit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Nah,
he's just trying to be "fair and balanced"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioINC Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's prettier than Anne Coulter
and she is actually a women(no offense to transexuals, Anne is just a lying whore)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioINC Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's prettier than Anne Coulter
and she is actually a women(no offense to transexuals, Anne is just a lying whore)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. get used to it. Between now and Nov every show on every network, cable or otherwise, is
going to have these types and worse. Some shows will have good balance, strong liberals like Maddow, but most will not. They do it because there is never any repercussions for their actions, ever. Why would cnn have coulter on who writes about lynching blacks and talks about perfecting jews? Or abc airing fiction about 9-11? Well, why wouldn't they do it? Its not like anyone, on a scale enough to hurt, would call for a boycott of the channel or their advertisers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. She's a garden variety ahole
You know that nearly every Afro-American man and woman on GEM$NBC is right wing. That takes some searching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's the nature of the American corporate media
they'll find the .5% of any given demographic or on any given issue (say global warming) and then overexpose that demographic or view to the point where people actually believe that it close to representative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC