Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court guided by "partisan, cultural, and perhaps religious allegiance,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 08:57 PM
Original message
Supreme Court guided by "partisan, cultural, and perhaps religious allegiance,"
George W. Bush's nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court in 2005 were widely expected to turn it sharply to the right. But no one foresaw the rapidity or the revolutionary zeal with which, as Ronald Dworkin writes, the Court would begin "overruling, most often by stealth, the central constitutional doctrines that generations of past justices, conservative as well as liberal, had constructed."

Dworkin examines the key decisions of the Court's 2006-2007 term and argues that these two new justices, along with Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, have created an "unbreakable phalanx bent on remaking constitutional law." They are guided not by political ideology or conservative judicial principle but rather by "partisan, cultural, and perhaps religious allegiance," and disdain tradition, precedent, even careful legal reasoning.

In his analyses of the prior records of Roberts and Alito, Dworkin finds ample evidence that both have long held strong conservative convictions. But during their confirmation hearings, they gave little hint of their judicial philosophy, hiding behind vague promises to make decisions "according to the rule of law." If senators fail to press nominees for candid answers to the controversial questions of principle underlying the Constitution, Dworkin contends, then the confirmation process is irrelevant.

As a result, the Court may be dominated for a generation by justices whose views are far from those of most Americans. Its past decisions on issues such as abortion, affirmative action, and executive power, Dworkin fears, are "vulnerable to reversal in the next several years as the fiercely conservative justices set out to rewrite American constitutional law without much caring about the logic of the arguments they use to do so. Bush's appointment of Roberts and Alito may prove to be among the worst of the many disasters of his miserable administration."

http://www.nybooks.com/shop/product?usca_p=t&product_id=7932
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Democrats that allowed these nominations to occur
should not be rewarded with any other prestigious roles. The screwed America when they rolled over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. As much of a Dem supporter as I am...
Allowing these nominations to go forward was the worst blunder on their part since the IWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed! They knuckled under and showed no spine.
Edited on Mon May-12-08 09:29 PM by MadMaddie
These among other things will be reviewed by Historians as major Democratic mistakes in aiding and abetting the Repbulican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. But But But
didn't they look into their eyes and see that their hearts were in the right places or some other stupid shit?:eyes:
It isn't just the SCOTUS that has screwed us. It is every arrogant idealogue that has been allowed to sit on the bench since bush took office and fuck every Democrat who kept their powder dry and didn't fight for us...but at the time their excuse was that they were waiting to fight the major battles (SCOTUS)...yet when it was time to do so, they rolled over and tucked their tails like a dog who gets beaten twice a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Harry Reid was leading a filibuster but several Dems refused
to join the Fillibuster.
http://www.democrats.com/alito-8

These articles are unbelievable..
<snip>
Judge Alito has tried to reassure Democratic senators by talking about his respect for Supreme Court precedents, including Roe v. Wade.
<snip>
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/13/opinion/13sun1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I consider any Senator who voted against the filibuster voted for
Alito. And that includes Senator Bill "I don't want Floridians to vote" Nelson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I guess Dworkin doesn't like Ernst Janning and Emil Hahn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. If it becomes painfully obvious that they are undermining the Constitution ...
and making decisions that have no legal reasoning behind them, couldn't they be impeached?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC