Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon Drops Charges Against "20th Hijacker"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:46 AM
Original message
Pentagon Drops Charges Against "20th Hijacker"
from AlterNet's PEEK:



Pentagon Drops Charges Against "20th Hijacker"

Posted by Attaturk , Firedoglake at 6:54 AM on May 13, 2008.

Harsh interrogations likely caused the Pentagon to abandon its prosecution of Mohammed al-Qahtani.



Heckuva job on not following the 'quaint' Geneva Convention against Torture:

The Pentagon has dropped charges against a Saudi at Guantanamo who was alleged to have been the so-called "20th hijacker" in the Sept. 11 attacks, his U.S. military defense lawyer said Monday.

Mohammed al-Qahtani was one of six men charged by the military in February with murder and war crimes for their alleged roles in the 2001 attacks. Authorities say al-Qahtani missed out on taking part in the attacks because he was denied entry to the U.S. by an immigration agent.

But in reviewing the case, the convening authority for military commissions, Susan Crawford, decided to dismiss the charges against al-Qahtani and proceed with the arraignment for the other five, said Army Lt. Col. Bryan Broyles, the Saudi's military lawyer.


And just why did they dismiss the charges now?

The attorney said he could not comment on the reasons for the dismissal until discussing the case with lawyers for the other five defendants. Officials previously said al-Qahtani had been subjected to a harsh interrogation authorized by former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.


I feel a chorus of 'Proud to be an American' coming on. Excuse me while I take my anti-treacle medication.

The charges were dismissed without prejudice -- but not the torture of course -- so they could be refiled at a later time.

But why this is occurring may be considered in context with what is happening with the other five individuals:

A Pentagon spokesman, Navy Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon, confirmed the case was proceeding against the five defendants and that their arraignment will be within 30 days of the charges being served at the U.S. base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba...

The five defendants include Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the terrorist attacks in 2001 that killed nearly 3,000 people, and Ramzi Binalshibh, who is said to have been the main intermediary between the hijackers and al-Qaida leaders. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for all of them.


Must get these trials on camera and before the election and all, if at all possible. But al-Qahtani being tried would clearly be embarrassing because his confession was the product of torture which he later recanted. The evidence of his guilt must be very tied to the torture-produced confession.

The alleged torture, which he detailed in a written statement, included being beaten, restrained for long periods in uncomfortable positions, threatened with dogs, exposed to loud music and freezing temperatures and stripped nude in front of female personnel.


'God bless the U-S-A!'


http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/85227/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is 20th hijacker like Al Qaeda #2?
didn't they already call someone else the 20th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmmm
Didn't Bush at one time say that torture methods employed against al-Qahtani were vital in the subsequent determent of terrorism?

Googling...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Heckuva job, Bushies! You finally capture someone who may actually be guilty of actual terrorism...
... and you fuck it up so badly, by arrogantly and flagrantly breaking the law, that now he's probably going to go free.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. torture garners this??? that's brilliant Addington!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. If he wasn't a terrorist before, he'll be one now
You can't beat the shit out of someone over and over, waterboard him repeatedly and make him live in a dog kennel for years upon end without making him want to gain revenge. Which he WILL do, as soon as he possibly can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wasn't Zacarias Moussaoui supposed to be the 20th hijacker?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think he was the 19 1/2th hijacker. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. If a person was writing a script they migh want to have a parallel
reason for release - that the interrogation involved a mistake that exposed a MIHOP piece of the action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. How strange is it that the Pentagon is filing charges against people?
and not enlistees or officers

Strange times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC