Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Wexler may call for inherent contempt for Kkkarl Rove

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:37 PM
Original message
Robert Wexler may call for inherent contempt for Kkkarl Rove
Dear Sharon,

Last night, I appeared on MSNBC's Verdict with Dan Abrams to discuss Karl Rove's outrageous refusal to appear before Congress regarding serious allegations that he used the US Justice Department to take down a prominent Democratic politician. It is alleged that Mr. Rove personally instigated the prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don Siegleman. The case has been criticized by legal experts, and 52 former state attorney generals – both Republicans and Democrats – have criticized the case and called for an investigation. (You may view the clip here.)

If Rove refuses to testify voluntarily and ignores the subpoenas that will certainly be issued, he should be held in Inherent Contempt of the House of Representatives.

No American is above the law. None of us should be able to ignore Congress without consequence. If Mr. Rove ignores a subpoena from the Judiciary Committee, then the House of Representatives should pass an Inherent Contempt citation and exercise our right to send the House Sergeant-of-Arms to gather Mr. Rove and bring him before Congress to testify.

I do not advocate this option lightly, but the reality is that Congress has few options left against an Administration that totally refuses to submit to any type of reasonable Congressional oversight. Congress has both the right and obligation to investigate these matters. Never before has an Executive so upset the checks and balances inherent in our Constitution. If we back off or delay, we effectively forfeit the power of Congress to investigate the Executive branch.

Rove is not the first White House official to ignore Congress. We have seen a pattern of refusals based on laughable claims of executive privilege. First, White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten and former White House Counsel Harriet Miers ignored subpoenas on the investigation into the firing of US Attorney Generals for partisan political motives.

Their refusal to testify was unprecedented: never before have executive officials totally refused to even show up before Congress. Bolten and Miers are the highest officials ever held in contempt of Congress. Unfortunately, Attorney General Mukasey – in a dereliction of duty – has refused to enforce the contempt decree and now Congress is suing them in District Court to demand compliance. Then, the Vice President's Chief of Staff, David Addington, refused to testify on the investigation into the Bush Administration's ordering of torture. Now, Rove continues this executive arrogance by also refusing to testify.

Enough is enough. We have a Constitutional obligation to provide accountability to a White House that is trying usurp the constitutional powers of Congress.

These are the very reasons why I have been pushing for impeachment hearings for Vice President Cheney. The Bush Administration has been running roughshod over the Constitution for eight long years. We should not allow the promise of a positive election be used as an excuse to ignore our duty to investigate crimes that weaken the very fabric of our Democracy.

I thank you again for your commitment to the causes that we hold so dear.

With warm regards,

Congressman Robert Wexler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn I hope he follows through with this cause I would love to see Rove...
in leg irons.... Wonder how Bush would react to this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for sharing
Sharon; however, I will get excited when Wexler says they WILL call for inherent contempt charges against turdblossom. Until then, same old, same old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hit him with the Contempt charge and send the Feds to ARREST him
STOP pussyfooting around! What is it going to take to get one of these bastards in a JAIL CELL? Stop the slow drip drip drip of *meetings* and start shaking some of the shit up! :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Calll me when they DO IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R.
Do it, Congressman! Time is running out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wexler!
Got to love the guy! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. It sure is a lonely fight for him
He sure has my moral support though and I hope he can convince some other Patriots to follow him on this..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Conyers sometimes sniffs on the right track but it seems he accomplishes little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. The neocons in the Canadian government are behaving in the same imperial fashion.
So you are not alone. I just wanted you to know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. I have 2 fears here ...
The first is that they will move too fast and before the end of the year someone finds themselves in front of a judge and Bush breaks out the power of the pardon. The second is that the move too slow and after the election lose enthusiasm for prosecuting these criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yeah, the timing has to be just right
Although I could see Bush issuing a pre-emptive pardon for Kkkarl for anything he may be convicted of at any time in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why isn't this man running for President?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. I hope he does while I'm still in DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. ROVE IS A CANCER TO OUR NATION
:nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. i just got the same e-mail, different name(dear spanone)..asking for donations...
Edited on Thu May-15-08 06:40 PM by spanone
why does a congressman need outside money to do his job? not accusing, just wondering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. I received the same e-mail.
I guess the Inherent Contempt option is Congress' "nuclear option" when all other attempts to get the executive branch to stop ignoring their subpoenas have failed. It's damn well ABOUT TIME!!! I'm inclined to send Congressman Wexler a donation for his re-election campaign just on the basis of this e-mail...although maybe I should hold off to see if he actually follows through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. Dear Congressman Wexler,
Call me when you actually DO SOMETHING to bring these crooks to justice!

Sincerely,

Disgusted American Citizen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Just do it or SHUT.THE.FUCK.UP!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yes. Tired of the posturing.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC