Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How to explain the term "neo-con"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:20 AM
Original message
How to explain the term "neo-con"
How would you explain this to someone who is very non-political?
I tried to do it yesterday, but I didn't feel that I was getting the point across in the most effective way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think it's very overused, especially here.
People seem to think "neo-con" has some sort of panache that's lacking in "conservative". But I'd say 90% of the time people here use it, they just mean "conservative".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I always hear people talk about how
there are no "real" conservatives left. Maybe Chuck Hagel. But, some how, every other conservative has left the right for the far-right neo-con world. I'm starting to think that it's not so "neo" any more...it's become the standard for conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. IMO, there are very few real conservatives left...
Which I see as Goldwater types.

It does seem like there was a melding of religious right and neoconserv attitudes into what we're seeing today. I find that a little frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. But there are no republicon 'conservatives'
Edited on Fri May-23-08 07:30 AM by SpiralHawk
That word is just republicon homelander propaganda.

Republicons borrow and spend, borrow and spend, borrow and spend. They have trashed America's economy, environment, Armed Services, and Constitution.

That's all radical, and all wrong.

Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Borrow-and-spend republicons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's conservs who want the US to be macho like Rambo...
ready to kick ass and show the world they're the roughest dudes on the block. The US will kill you with it's pinky finger if you mess with it. That's how I understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kristol described neoconservatives
...as "liberals mugged by reality". Its cynicism does define them well.

This is from Wikipedia:

The term neoconservative was originally used as a criticism against liberals who had "moved to the right".<3><4> Michael Harrington, a democratic socialist, coined the usage of neoconservative in a 1973 Dissent magazine article concerning welfare policy.<5> According to E. J. Dionne, the nascent neoconservatives were driven by "the notion that liberalism" had failed and "no longer knew what it was talking about."<1>

Perhaps "bitter former liberals rife with neuroses" sums them up? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It has evolved over the years to what it is today...
Neocons like Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Cheney were never libs. These assholes want democracy in the Middle East by the use of a gun. That's why they've got such a hard on to bomb Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I would argue that the form of democracy that they peddle...
has a decided Fascist tone to it.

For me it always has that corporatist stench permeating it. They tend to label anything even remotely collectivist in nature as socialist or communist. They are really fond of simple labels, and love to apply them willy-nilly, and without any real justification for them.

They are not real fond of thinking about things, but seem to love spewing buzz-words and talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Maybe this is the result of their mixing
...with conservatism (the party they feel comfiest hiding within) and neoliberalism, which is all about corporatism and the so-called free market?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I probably should have said 'their twisted idea of democracy'...
Maybe they think the two hour action movie is the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. The fundamental problem with that framing is that there was never anything remotely liberal about
the Neo Con nut jobs running the show today. The closest thing to the fascist idiots in charge is Nazi SS . Their faith in AmeriKKKan supremacy and willingness to use any means to enrich them selves at our expense is without limit. But what else would you expect from Hitler's bankers grand larvae?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, they have morphed into something far more sinister
No wonder so many of them bristle at being called neocons. The original neocons were pansies compared to these sociopaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. agreed they personify the worst aspects of unregulated capitalist corruption and unmitigated greed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. I like your description
short, sweet and accurate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. They are mainly ex-Trotskyites
Mainly from New York City, who broke with their comrades and became conservatives because they wanted to take a hard line in the Cold War. Few in number, but intellectuals, schooled in a brand of totally committed take-no-prisoners politics they learned as left-wing extremists, now become rightwing extremists. Many have risen to prominence in academia and have students who have gone on to be successful, so that there are now second and even third-generation neoconservatives.

Their ideology is that democracy is good, and so wars to protect democracy are good. They seem pretty much to care more about the wars than democracy itself, however. They like the free market and are generally socially conservative, but really they don't care for much except war, the means of waging it, etc. Always looking to attack somebody or other in the Middle east, the ascendancy of the Bush administration was a godsend for them, raising as it did a more than a couple of neocons to positions to make policy decisions.

I think THE book to read on th subject is "They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons" by Jacob Heilbrunn. Made it halfway through and skimmed the rest because I got to the part of history I remember firsthand, plus, well, there's only so much neocon I can take before I get m blood pressure up to where it should not be.

Oh, and many of them happen to be Jewish, so much so that many neocons take offense even at the mere use of the word "neocon," claiming it's somehow antisemitic. I don't see how, because many important neocons have not been Jews, but there you have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I once listened to Limbaugh (not by choice) go into a tirade about this
and how calling someone a neo-con was like calling them a "Jew." I didn't know what the hell he was talking about (nothing new there), as I've always understood neo-con as a purely political term (rightly, I think). This does shed some light on the association, but it appears ridiculous to view the word neo-con as something distinctly Jewish when most of them seem to be Protestant and Evangelical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Since when is "Jew" an insult?
I always assumed it was the correct noun for an individual either a) professing the Jewish religious faith; or b) born into a family that identifies itself as Jewish.

Is there something degrading or insulting about either of those things?

bewilderedly,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. according to Rush, I guess there is
I'm only repeating what I heard when I was forced to listen to his ravings while riding with someone. I don't try to make sense of any of it. There's no point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I have actually seen RW isolationists use the term in an anti-semitic way
But they use lots of terms in nasty ways.

We should steer clear both of neo-cons (in the usual sense) and RW isolationists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think it originally meant...
Edited on Fri May-23-08 02:56 AM by LeftishBrit
former liberals/ Democrats/ sometimes even far-leftists, who turned conservative, mainly due to a perceived need for hawkishness on foreign policy.

It's now often used just to mean super-conservative or RW imperialist however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
18. Neocons also oppose the public sector to an irrational degree.
Neocons are usually Friedmanites, aren't they? They want to privatize everything but the military. That's another reason things are so incredibly screwed up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. Neo, new. Con, as in, con job = The New Con
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
24.  margotb822
margotb822

The Neo-Conservative should have labeled them selfs at the neo-nazis, og the neo-facisms. Because that it what they really are.. They are just so much better cloth, and better behaviored than the old nazis was... And they have no brown shirts to do their bidding - yet.. But I feel that the Black water group could be that very soon...

Diclotican

Sorry my bad english,not my native language

ps are your name Margot?. If so is the case, my grandmother had that name when she was alive;) Nice to se that an old norwigian name still living well;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC