Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just Because You Are Not Paranoid, It Doesn't Mean That They Are Not After You!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM
Original message
Just Because You Are Not Paranoid, It Doesn't Mean That They Are Not After You!
from HuffPost:




Norman Horowitz
Just Because You Are Not Paranoid, It Doesn't Mean That They Are Not After You!
Posted May 24, 2008 | 08:40 AM (EST)



This is about "the Business of Television," whatever that means. Does it matter to very many people? I think not but if you like "show business speculation" it could be interesting to you.

I am a media person who sees a conspiracy behind almost everything that happens in the media today. As a rule this involves two or more companies who get together to "screw" a third company while at the same time keeping a close eye on one another, (their partners.)

There is a common thread in a good deal of this story that has been reported in the last couple of weeks.

Blockbuster has been reported to be in talks about taking a stake in the Viacom led premium television channel that intends to compete with HBO, Showtime and Starz. Blockbuster would get digital rights to the new channel's programming in return for an investment in the partnership, if you were to believe what they are saying.

Viacom, the owner of Paramount Pictures, said that it would join with Lions Gate and MGM to launch a new pay-TV channel. Purportedly they will show movies and original television series made by the three companies. The companies presently sell their movies to premium channel Showtime owned by CBS, but talks to renew their agreement fell apart when CBS tried to cut the price. (How dare they?)

The new partnership is purportedly in talks with cable operators and various companies with digital interests about deals to distribute the as-yet unnamed channel, which will debut in fall 2009.

Blockbuster, once owned by Viacom, has been casting its net wide for new partners as it attempts to increase its video-rental business model with new digital ventures."

My convoluted Question is:
Where is the common thread in this story?
Give up yet?
The Answer, drum roll please, is Sumner Redstone.
Sumner remains Chairman of Viacom,
Sumner remains Chairman of CBS;
Viacom was spun off by CBS almost 40 years ago.
Viacom merged with CBS a long time ago.
Viacom had at one time owned Showtime.
CBS now owns Showtime.
Viacom had once owned Blockbuster, and then spun it off.
Viacom and CBS became separate companies recently.
OK, and now to annoy a few people, MGM and Lions Gate are relatively minor players in the Major Motion Picture industry. Paramount's movies matter, and matter a lot.
If Showtime is unwilling to pay Paramount, MGM, and Lions Gate what they think they need for their movies, and HBO and Starz can "live" very well without these two companies, why not "threaten" everyone with a "we will start our own Pay service. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/norman-horowitz/just-because-you-are-not_b_103384.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Early Afternoon Kick....
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC