Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Votes to Ban Pentagon Propaganda: Networks Still Silent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 04:01 PM
Original message
House Votes to Ban Pentagon Propaganda: Networks Still Silent
from HuffPost:




Josh Silver
House Votes to Ban Pentagon Propaganda: Networks Still Silent
Posted May 24, 2008 | 04:57 PM (EST)



You probably didn't hear about the House voting to ban Pentagon propaganda last Thursday -- since the television networks have once again conveniently failed to cover the story.

But in a surprise move, a 2009 defense policy bill passed with an amendment, sponsored by Rep. Paul Hodes (D-N.H.), that outlaws the Defense Department from engaging in "a concerted effort to propagandize" the American people. The measure would also force an investigation by the Government Accountability Office into efforts to plant positive news stories about the war in U.S. media.

An April 20 front-page New York Times article first reported how the Pentagon cultivated and coached more than 75 former military officers who became regulars on Fox News, CNN, the broadcast networks, and even NPR. One week later, the Pentagon announced that it would suspend the "briefing" program pending an internal review, which is continuing. On May 13, watchdog Media Matters documented that analysts in the Pentagon's program appeared or were quoted in major outlets more than 4,500 times.

If the Senate also passes the propaganda ban, it will send a strong message to the Pentagon and other government agencies that the Congress will not allow the continued manipulation of public opinion.

But let's not forget that this is just the most recent major government propaganda revelation in recent years. In March 2005, the New York Times revealed that several federal agencies were producing fake "video news releases" that local television stations aired as if they were bona fide news reports.

Two months before that, several "payola pundits" were discovered to be receiving lucrative government PR contracts to opine in favor of Bush administration policies -- without disclosing their financial arrangement. Armstrong Williams was the poster-child, with his $240,000 contract from the Department of Education to promote the president's "No Child Left Behind Act." .....(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-silver/house-votes-to-ban-pentag_b_103431.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good. It is disgusting to be force fed ads for the military when you go to a movie.
They make me sick - they are so slicked up and obviously designed to appeal to younger people. The marketing arm of the military is going full speed ahead.

They sell the business of war like it's a fun and recreational activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "They sell the business of war like it's a fun and recreational activity."
Sad but true.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. i thought this was already illegal.
not that that sort of thing stops republicans and militarists from much these days....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. So did I. Since no one is prosecuting anything down there in Foggy
Bottom, all redundant legislation is done for symbolic purposes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm in! There's 3 of us. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. You need to vote on it? Good Lord...what happened to decency?
(rhetorical question)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yay, my rep does good!
He was swept into office in the anti-Iraq 2004 election - glad he remembers that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. A very under-reported story, so far. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. no legislation is complete without a George W. Bush signing statement . . .
wait for it . . . should be a hoot . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. How do I find out how the HOR reps voted? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Does anyone know the amendment number. I want to know who voted for and against. Anyone able to
help? I found the basic bill but not the amendment number or vote tally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC