Karl Rove on his involvement in Siegelman case:

[proud2BlibKansan]

UUh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know,Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, UUh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, UUh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know,Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, UUh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know,Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know, Uh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTmIlC1vzwU&eurl=http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x137481

[liberalmuse]

1. And we get the Porky Pig defense.

How adequate.

[rurallib]

2. You can tell he's lying simply because he spoke

[patrice]

3. Rove thinks we are too stupid to recognize "plausable deniability".

Anything he said to anyone about anything would have been strictly ONE WAY communication.

Rove thinks we've forgotten Iran-Contra-gate. When it comes to breaking the law, they don't say directly to an operative "You do this _________________" and that operative says back to him "Yes I will do ____________."

Henry II set the model in the 13th(?) century, "Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?" Political powers don't say things like that and then wait around for someone to say "Yes sir, I'll go murder him for you."

Of course the first Rove HEARD anything about it was in the media. That's standard operating procedure. That doesn't mean he talked to no one.

As Stephanopulous observed, "That's not a denial"; only hearing about it in the media is not a denial that he said something and he must avoid lying about what he said to others, because if someone can demonstrate that he lies (surprise! surprise!) that will make this much worse for him.

So, I wonder who else the Senate is talking to.

[L. Coyote]

4. He said he first "read about it" by reading about it in the newspaper

[proud2BlibKansan]

5. That was after he said

UUh, I, I've, I've, I've, uh, you know,