Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recount Movie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:48 PM
Original message
Recount Movie
Great movie. It really illustrates that Gore would have won had the Supreme Court not stopped the recount.

I do have a few minor complaints based on some omissions made in the film.

First, Gore did offer Bush a full statewide recount on Nov. 12th and Bush refused.

Second, regarding military ballots while it made clear that Gore campaign's memo did not target military ballots it did not note that the Bush campaign's counsel issued a memo regarding the standards for absentee ballots that was almost word for word identical to the Gore campaign's memo.

Third, also in regard to military ballots Republicans objected to and had throw out almost twice as many military ballots in heavily democratic districts.

Finally, they never turned a critical eye on the media which slanted their coverage to favor Bush from day one. Many of the facts presented in the film plus those I pointed out above were never covered by the news media in this country. I assume that HBO didn't want to piss-off it's sister channel CNN but it still would have been nice if there was at least one line to recognize the blatant media bias that went on in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. They also omitted that Faux News was the first
to call Florida for Bush after all the major stations called it for Gore and then pulled it back to too close to call. That's what I remember. Am I wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I think HBO ignored FAUX because it's not really a news channel!
Okay, maybe it has something to do with FARCE Noise Channel being a CNN competitor (as is MSNBC, which was also omitted), but you can't help thinking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Bush's first cousin working at Fox, John Ellis, called it for Bush.
George W. Bush steals 2000 Election
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SprsUaX5j78

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. actually they did what you said under second
they point out that the very same standards were being used, at Bush's insistance, to reject absentee ballots from Israel (in the call with Lieberman).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. If the SCOTUS hadn't issued a stay on the Florida Supreme Court recount..
Edited on Sun May-25-08 10:59 PM by NJSecularist
Bush still would have won by about 500 votes. The parameters of the Florida Supreme Court recount weren't going to give Gore enough votes to put him over the top.

However, if a recount was made on the basis of counting all votes based on what each county's election officials had set as valid parameters for a recount before the election, Gore would have won.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's not true!
Edited on Sun May-25-08 11:11 PM by JamesA1102
The Media Consortium hired the National Opinion Research Center to examine 175,010 ballots that were never counted in Florida. The investigation took 8 months and cost $900,000. No matter what standard for judging ballots is applied, Gore wins.


Certified by Katherine Harris
Gore Deficit or Lead -537


Valid votes found after certification
Gore Gain +59
Gore Deficit or Lead -478


Correctly marked paper ballots
Gore Gain +493
Gore Deficit or Lead +15

Full punches
Gore Gain +100
Gore Deficit or Lead +115

Poorly marked paper ballot
Gore Gain +309
Gore Deficit or Lead +424

3-corner chads
Gore Gain -208
Gore Deficit or Lead +216

2-corner chads
Gore Gain -111
Gore Deficit or Lead +105

1-corner chads
Gore Gain -45
Gore Deficit or Lead +60

Dimples with sunlight
Gore Gain +88
Gore Deficit or Lead +148

Dimples
Gore Gain -41
Gore Deficit or Lead +107

http://www.norc.uchicago.edu/fl/index.asp


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. What about the Miami Herald's recount?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Nice bit of mathematical trickery by the Times
As that stated on the 'What if' tab "Counties that said they would not have conducted a recount are not included." However, all the counties were recounting the under votes after Supreme Court ordered them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Yet none of Gore's possible victory margins exceeds the certified margin.
That always seemed fabulously improbable. :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. And they didn't mention FAMU
The students whose precincts were moved and/or had to go through police checks to get to their polling places. The kids protested at the state house but their actions were largely ignored by the media.

I agree that they let the media skate. They let them skate big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. How in the World can those Family Valued guys be proud of their Party??
They Stole the damn thing...lied cheated stole....how are they supposed to be GOOD, like in their Family Values Code they supposedly use?

They are thieves and scammers...il fit to be Leaders....and 7 years later, no shit...lookit the damage....Damn....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Has anything ever been done about purging voter rolls?
This movie brought back a lot of memories and anger in me. It's been EIGHT DAMN YEARS but I know I've heard about voter rolls still being purged in many States. I don't mean that it should never be done. There are valid reasons to do it on some kind of schedule. People die, and they move. Although I've always registered in my new precinct, I NEVER thought to notify the old one that I'm not there anymore. I doubt many people do. But the way it's been done in the last 8-10 years is ILLEGAL, but I've not heard of any progress in correcting the problem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. I had to turn it off . . .
It was actually pretty good, but I had the sickest feeling in my stomache. I think I threw up in my mouth when the Neo-Con thugs stormed the office where the recount was taking place . . .


I can watch it again come December - but it's good for the mad moms in minivans in the midwest to watch so they can understand how freaking angry so many Americans have been for close to 8 years. Truth be told (for them at least) - AT LAST. Effing sheeples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. It was a great movie, and hard to watch
How flippant it was for Baker to claim that "there were no tanks in the streets.."

I think that the media preferred Bush was because... he offered a more interesting story. A frat boy, a former alcohol (and drugs?) abuser with an easy manners with whom many would love to drink beer...

Let's face it. Our candidates: Dukakis, Gore, Kerry, have always presented an image of very serious, deep thinking men with whom most voters could not identify. This is still the greatness of Bill Clinton. That he did connect.

We know that when a consortium of media outlet finally did count all the ballots, that Bush still came ahead by 300-something.

But the outrageous if the story was the inflating the list of convicts who could not vote, and, I think, of many minorities who could not even vote because of long lines - if memory serves me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. Have I told you how much I hate Lieberman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It was not only Lieberman. Also Christopher
and.. yes, Gore.

We, democrats, have decided to play nice and to choose the "high road.." even our candidates have been highly educated talking in multisylables, preferring to stay away from "street battle.."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. HBO belts one out of the park. Nice job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shagsak Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. I made it through the whole thing
But I am pretty sure there were quite a few inconsistencies that I didn't see or know about. Overall it was an OK piece depending on it's actual accuracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC