Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eye on the Senate: Another State with Republican Woes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:57 PM
Original message
Eye on the Senate: Another State with Republican Woes
Edited on Mon May-26-08 11:03 PM by wicasa
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/polltracker/2008/05/eye-on-the-senate-another-stat.html

Eye on the Senate: Another State with Republican Woes

May 26, 2008 3:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)


Congressional Quarterly has an updated summary on Senate races today:


I wouldn't know what to cut if I were to quote it, so I'll just summarize.


Congressional Quarterly specifically discusses New Hampshire, Colorado, Minnesota, Maine, Kansas, Alaska, New Mexico, and North Carolina.

It considers all of these races to be competitive, and the article does not rule out other races as possibly being competitive too. Interestingly, CQ's discussion of the individuals races, with supporting polls, more often than not puts the Democrat in a better position than CQ's assessment on its election maps. This is clearly true in Alaska and North Carolina, but perhaps CQ is getting ready to do a map update.


Anyway, specific polls of interest:


New Hampshire: Jeanne Shaheen 50 Republican incumbent John Sununu 43 2 percent "other" and 4 percent undecided, Rasmussen Reports May 21. The margin of error is 4.5 percent.


Colorado: Democrat Mark Udall 47 Republican Bob Schaffer 41
Rasmussen Reports poll conducted May 19. Nine percent undecided. margin of error is 4.5 percent.


Minnesota: Democrat Al Franken 44 Republican Norm Coleman 51
Minneapolis Star Tribune. May 12-15. margin of error is 3.6 percent


Maine: Republican Sen. Susan Collins 52 Democratic challenger Tom Allen 42. However Allen has picked up 6 points in one month.
Rasmussen Reports poll conducted May 14. The margin of error is 4.5 percent.


Kansas: Republican Pat Roberts 50 Democrat Jim Slattery 42
Source and date of poll not given


Alaska: Republican Ted Stevens 45 Democrat Mark Begich 47
Rasmussen Reports. May 14. The margin of error is 4.5 percent.



New Mexico: Democrat Tom Udall 61 Republican Heather Wilson 35 or
Democrat Tom Udall 60 Republican Steve Pearce 36
SurveyUSA May 12-14. Margin of error 4.8 %



North Carolina: Republican Elizabeth Dole 48 Democrat Kay Hagan 43.
Public Policy Polling. May 8=9. Margin of error 4%

&

Republican Elizabeth Dole 48
Democrat Kay Hagan 47
Rasmussen Reports. May 25.
One month ago Rasmussen had Elizabeth Dole leading by 13%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please add Oregon
Oregon: Republican Gordon Smith...45
Democratic challenger Jeff Merkley...42

Smith.......45
Merkley......42


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2008/05/smith_merkley_tight.html

Two polls showing Democratic challengers running close to or ahead of their Republican rivals in Mississippi and North Carolina, which were once thought to be third-tier hopes at best, could be a coincidence. Then again, a third could be a trend. And here it is: A new poll conducted for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee shows the new Democratic nominee running barely behind two-term GOP Senator Gordon Smith of Oregon.

The survey, taken by the Feldman Group for the DSCC between 5/12-16 -- that is, before the state's May 20 primary in which State House Speaker Jeff Merkley narrowly defeated Portland attorney Steve Novick -- tested 800 likely voters for a margin of error of +/- 3%. Questions pitting Smith and Merkley were released to the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
Oregon, Colorado, and Virginia could have warranted discussion, except that just maybe, in Virginia, even though it is presently Republican, the Democrat is favored by enough that maybe its not really competitive.

However I was not writing on my own perceptions of Senate races, but rather summarizing the article I had read at Congressional Quarterly.

Interesting, although Congressional Quarterly did not discuss Oregon in the article I summarized, they do consider it a competitive race, rating it as "leaning Republican" meaning that they perceive Smith to have only a small advantage.

We are pulling for you in Oregon too.

Incidentally, I lived in Oregon for most of the year of 1998, and voted out there in the 1998 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC