Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McAuliffe Criticizes Scott McClellan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:07 AM
Original message
McAuliffe Criticizes Scott McClellan
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0508/McAuliffe_doesnt_like_McClellan_book_either.html

McAuliffe doesn't like McClellan book, either

Give the Macker credit: he knows from loyalty.

In an interview with the multi-media Tammy Haddad for National Journal:

I would also say, and I gotta add a personal thing, I never like it when someone works for someone and then comes out and writes a book trashing them. I just think that is, I don't care if it is politics or life, if he was that upset about everything, he should have quit. Remember Gerald Ford's press secretary quit when he disagreed with pardoning, Ford pardoning Nixon. If you don't agree, then get out. And I just, I find it abhorrent the way these people come out and write books about their boss. It made 'em money, it made 'em prestige, it gave them all this power and then they turn around and slap 'em. I just, I gotta tell you, I just uh, I don't care who it is- Democrat, Republican- it's wrong.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. There was too much complacency in Bush's administration
McClellan got up there day after day and lied. He was purposeful. He helped to put American in this mess.

What I have found is that many many people could have stepped up and did not. They did the politically safe thing. To keep the job. To enhance their resume. To run for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. so terry thinks scott should have kept his mouth shut....guess that is a criticism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madame defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Who wants to bet that...
McAuliffe writes a tell-all book about the Clintons...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, can't let exposing constitutional crimes and lies stand in the way of loyalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wow, Terry has really become a full-fledged repuke....
agreeing with Ari, Dana, et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. He's not the only one.
I've noticed more than one Clinton surrogate strike this tone. IMO, it's the reason impeachment was taken off the table (yes, my opinion and hope it doesn't ruffle feathers). To me, loyalty to the country and it's people and constitution come first, not loyalty to a particular leader or leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harrison Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, I guess ultimately it is comes down to whom you
are most loyal: a criminal administration or the people of the United States. A late conversion is better than no conversion at all. We are only talking about ripping away the pretext for war, Mr. McAuliffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Seems like the entire Clincon team is getting Rove talking points
how sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. McAuliffe trashed both Gore and Kerry for years. But then, he never worked for them or Dem voters
as he was head of the DNC to use it to secure 2008 for Hillary which meant letting the RNC steal 2002 and 2004, too, for BushInc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. hollow outrage...
I mean, he's claiming all this moral high-ground saying McClellan shouldn't have written about his boss, but apparently the action of his 'boss' are beyond reproach no matter how heinous.

Typical rethug 'framing'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's *not * wrong. It's *right*.
>>>I just, I gotta tell you, I just uh, I don't care who it is- Democrat, Republican- it's wrong.>>>>

We live in a democracy... I think, don't we? It is ( we used to say as kids) a 'free country."

It's a bit more free and more democratic whenever gov't employees resist the call to secrecy and 'loyalty' to those that hired them to serve on the public's dime.

McCauliff's argument speaks volumes about his mindset. The war isn't important, the deception, the loss of life, the cultivation of a totalitarian state.

What's important is the lack of "loyalty" of the whistleblower.

Good god.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. those that did the unsafe thing
Weren't there a hell of a lot of RUINED LIVES for those that had the courage to speak up at the time?

Wasn't it about the worst career or life move one could possibly make?

Seemed comparable to getting blacklisted during the McCarthy era back in the 50's.

How many of us would give up a livelihood we worked many years to achieve in the name of principle?

-90% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. I prefer some transparency and integrity and common sense over partisan loyalty
Thats been a fear of mine about a Clinton administration - loyalty and soundbites over transparency and logical appeals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I Think the Whole Criticism was...
...that McClellan got up day after day and told the Bush lies. There were a whole lot of people who knew they were lies at the time. If he thought he was telling lies, and he had any integrity at all, he should have quit and talked then when it could have saved some lives.
Maybe he did quit because of it, but I think Bolton was going to push him out anyhow, so maybe Scotty was making some noises about the lies he had to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Obviously, sooo not a fan of Devil Wears Prada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. he did quit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC