Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid: Lieberman's Chairmanship is Safe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:45 PM
Original message
Reid: Lieberman's Chairmanship is Safe
:puke: :argh:


from AlterNet's PEEK:



Reid: Lieberman's Chairmanship is Safe

Posted by GottaLaff , The Political Carnival at 2:30 PM on June 5, 2008.

Reid capitulates to Lieberman.



I think you'll agree, this is a classic "Huh???" moment:

It didn't go over well among Democrats when Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, who has backed John McCain for president, criticized Barack Obama on Israel just one day after Obama's historic nomination clinching victory.

But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) says Lieberman's committee chairmanship "I'm not about to threaten anybody," Reid told reporters Thursday afternoon. "... Joe Lieberman is an important vote for this caucus."is safe and Lieberman remains an important vote for Democrats.


There must be a reasonable explanation. There must be. Counting to 10. 1... 2... 3...

Indeed, in a Senate divided 51-49, Lieberman's vote on virtually every other issue outside of the war in Iraq can be critical. Reid pointed out that the Democratic budget resolution would not have passed Wednesday without Lieberman's vote. Lieberman has called himself an "Independent Democrat" ever since he lost the Connecticut Democratic primary in 2006 — a loss largely attributed to his support of the war in Iraq.


...4 ...5 ...6... Someone do something. Barack?

On Wednesday in the Senate chamber, Obama very publicly cornered Lieberman and had a direct, but not heated, conversation in the corner of the chamber.


LIEberman is a reliable Democratic voter the way KFed is a rapper. ...7 ... 8... 9...

Some Democrats have speculated that a greatly expanded Democratic Senate majority would allow Reid more leverage to yank Lieberman's chairmanship as punishment for supporting McCain, but there is no such movement afoot, Reid says.



http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/87201/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Two words:
Fuck. Reid.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whether Reid wants it or not come 2009 Lieberwhore will
be neutered for once and for all....he will not be in power. As for Reid I expect him to be replaced as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lieberman: another good reason to crush McCain, my friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe it's time to replace Reid also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whaaat???
Exactly what does it take for Reid?
We have to get rid of that weasel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. This story came from a Politico writer who has right wing slantings.
Martin Kady II

Raw Story had another slant on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Bacon Fat Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another strike against Reid!
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 09:18 PM by King Bacon Fat
Move Durbin up to Majority Leader and give Clinton Majority Whip for the 111th Congress, I say. Nobody could possibly do worse than Reid.

I miss Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson, myself. He seemed to get things done with a similarly divided Senate... he's got to be turning over in his grave with Reid, Cheney and Little Bush holding his one-time positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. We cannot take away his chairmanship until the new Congress comes in.
If Reid were to do so, he'd cross the aisle and become a Republican officially. This isn't rocket science here. It's common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC