Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Would Barack Obama Appoint To The Supreme Court?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:57 PM
Original message
Who Would Barack Obama Appoint To The Supreme Court?
Yes, I know Hillary Clinton, but rather than get into that whole debate, who else would or should be considered based on their judicial philosophy. With Hillary, it would be based heavily on political concerns, but assuming Hillary were not nominated, what kind of judge would Barack Obama appoint?

Lawrence Tribe even though he is getting up there in age? Tribe definitely is a mentor to Barack Obama. Here is an article speculating on the possible appointees:

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/the-next-supreme-court-justice/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lawrence Tribe and his colleague Kathleen Sullivan
Tribe who is one of the nation's foremost constitution scholars I believe once called Obama "the finest student I ever had".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Tribe Is 67 Unfortunately and Sullivan Failed The California Bar...
In 2005, though she did eventually pass the bar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. So?
As a California attorney who passed the bar, I don't think that passage is a mark of legal scholarship. It can be a very tiring three-day experience and you have to be having a good day, mentally and physically to do well, especially the multiple choice part where you have little time per question. I've known lawyers from Harvard and Yale who didn't pass their first time and night law school graduates who did. As for Tribe, I think he's a national treasure and I'd rather have him on the Court for five or ten years than almost anyone else for a longer time. I think we need serious redress on a host of Constitutional issues and we need it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jonathan Turley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Turley would be an interesting one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would appoint Judge Judy. But that's just me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Absolutely. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think Obama would resist appointing someone who wasn't a
constitutional law weenie, so that leaves out a lot of well-known names. I think he'll go for a center to left-of-center justice with a solid background in the law to offset the Bush appointees. It will damned sure be someone who believes in the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. John Edwards would be a good choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. If the Dems get a filibuster-proof majority, Obama should expand the size of the court
Increase the size to 11, or even 13 or 15 and banish the Fascist Four to the wilderness of obscure dissents.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Even if Obama could accomplish it (FDR tried and failed), it's a dangerous precedent.
I'd resist the temptation and hope one of the Fascist Four leaves an empty seat in the next 4-8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Oh, I'm just waiting for Fat Tony to kick it.
Just to warn all the faux-outrage empathy whores on DU: I'm gonna grave dance like nobody's business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Honey, we'll have a conga line. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. not going to happen
That idea blew up in FDR's face and you can bet your life that it won't be tried again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. God. Good question.
I have no idea—usually these people come out of the relative obscurity of the federal court system, no? I think it'd actually be hard to make a case for Hillary as constitutional scholar; I'm guessing there are better choices out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I hear God is busy.
Plus, there's that whole non-existence issue that would probably come out in the vetting.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. There's a headline I'd like to see: "Republican minority filibusters God."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Tim Russert. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuckinlodi Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Erwin Chemerinsky
THE Con Law expert in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
State the Obvious Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PlanetBev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Ditto that
Chemerinsky and Tribe or anyone else that would make Scalia's life miserable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Someone with law experience and other law experience related stuff ...
I would assume anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Possibly Walter Dellinger or Kathleen Sullivan -
Dellinger might be a little old (born in '41) but he did work with Obama at Chicago and he's one of the pre-eminent Constitutional scholars. I've also seen Kathleen Sullivan suggested - she's at Stanford right now and she's younger. Prsumably there are younger justices out of the 9th circuit who would be good bets as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Mario Cuomo
But I'm dreamer and stuck, to some degree, in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. I know a lot of people are going to say Edwards or Clinton...
... but I really find such overtly political appointments distasteful. The Supreme Court is a place for solid legal reasoning and interpretation of the law and constitution. To plant justices with the express purpose of accomplishing political tasks completely misses the point of that branch of government.

It is alright to place justices that lean left, but don't put in ringers or hatchet men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. probably a judge from one of the federal court of appeals
or possibly a state supreme court justice. Possibly an academic, although somewhat less likely.

Least likely: an elected (current or past) politician
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC