Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Teacher Fired for Teaching Students to Think

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 10:44 AM
Original message
LA Teacher Fired for Teaching Students to Think
from AlterNet's PEEK:



LA Teacher Fired for Teaching Students to Think

Posted by , Feministe at 7:56 AM on June 20, 2008.

Students rally behind inspirational instructor.



Yesterday while listening to Democracy Now! I heard about Karen Salazar for the first time. She is a high school teacher who was fired from her position at a school in LA because her curriculum was too “Afrocentric” - instead of, you know, the usual Eurocentric curriculum that’s delivered to American students on the daily. From a letter by Salazar posted on the Vivir Latino site:

I am being fired because I am trying to ensure that my curriculum is relevant to my students’ daily lived experiences, and in the process, create a space for them to be critical of Eurocentric society and curricula that only serve to reinforce their dehumanization, subjugation, and oppression …

I have been observed in the classroom and evaluated by administration over a dozen times (almost twice a month) this school year, whereas in comparison, most teachers are observed and evaluated 1-3 times per school year. The evaluations claim that I am creating “militancy” within students, promoting my personal political beliefs, and presenting a biased view of the curriculum. It has also been implied that I have been teaching students “how to protest.”

Three weeks ago, things began escalating when I was again observed, and in his evaluation, the administrator accused me of “brainwashing” my students and “forcing extremist views” on them. The class had been reading a 3-page excerpt of the Autobiography of Malcolm X (an LAUSD-approved text, of which we have several class sets in our school bookroom), in which Malcolm describes the first time he conked his hair…My contract is being terminated because according to the principal, I am “indoctrinating students with anti-Semitism and Afrocentrism.” The anti-Semitism accusation comes solely from the fact that I have an Intifada poster hanging in my classroom (a symbol of support for a free Palestine), and the Afrocentrism accusation comes from the fact my culturally-relevant curriculum reflects the demographics of my students, though I am surprised I am not being accused of Raza-centrism as well.


Needless to say, this shit is disgusting. And of course, as Democracy Now! reports, it’s not an isolated incident:

In 2006, Jay Bennish, a high school teacher from Aurora, Colorado, was briefly dismissed because one of his lectures was deemed “anti-American.” On the eve of the Iraq war in 2003, Deborah Mayer, an Indiana schoolteacher, was fired after telling her class, “I honk for peace.” A federal appeals court in Chicago upheld the school’s decision last year and ruled public school teachers do not have the constitutional right to express personal opinions in the classroom.


But this isn’t just about expressing personal opinions; it’s about the restrictions imposed upon teachers who may wish to counter the so-called history in most history books with information that actually reflects the many cultures and histories that make up this country - histories that often don’t make the United States look so swell. .....(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/88845/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. It cuts both ways
Schools don't want teachers imposing their personal agenda, whether it is fundametnalist Christian or whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But how is teaching an alternative version of American history imposing a personal agenda?
I wish someone had taught me something other than the glossed B.S. in U.S. history class.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Remember when that guy in CA was using early American documents to promote his Christian beliefs
He was selecting things (like the Declaration of Independence) that specifically mention God. It's basically the same thing from another direction that is going on now. Schools don't want either extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Peace is Anti-American
according to that second one.

shit like this pisses me off to no end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. I Can't Totally Disagree With The Decision, And Definitely Don't Find It Disgusting.
She was TOTALLY pushing a personal agenda and definitely injecting way too much personal viewpoint into her curriculum. That's not really appropriate for a public school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Much of the current history being taught is just plain
not factual.... It is Eurocentric, and extremely biased.

We must challenge the school system... to change their textbooks !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. and so it goes...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek_sabre Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, my issue is that she is an ENGLISH teacher
She should be teaching students how to read critically and write analytically, not rail against "the man." Of course, she is free to include whatever readings she feels will empower and interest her students, but she crossed the line for sure.

Watching her students defend her, I agree with the administration's decision. She would make a good guidance counselor or mentor for her students, but doesn't seem to be doing her job as an english teacher.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC