|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:01 PM Original message |
So what are the realistic chances of derailing this odious "compromise" in the Senate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. I believe the Senate already approved it. It was the House that held in up in Feb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. They did approve it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Purveyor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Blunt just said on the House floor that he hopes the Senate quickly approved the new bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. I assumed as much but wasn't sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Once again, the Republicans outsmarted the Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I don't if the Dems were outsmarted, or just didn't try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. I believe now with a change, there must be another vote. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. That's depressing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. they reported on cspan that it now goes to the senate then * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. You're kidding right? BOTH houses are full of the spineless bastards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. I understand the Senate will take it up next week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. You mean where we have an even SMALL majority? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TygrBright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
10. Probably less chance than there was of derailing the Missouri Compromise. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
13. We'd have to rely on people like Ben Nighthorse Salazar... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. We the people cannot defeat a tag team. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Yes we can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. That will come, and I don't relish the day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 04:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I don't relish it either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Well said, Watcher. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Thank You tom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. I'll sum it up in two words: "It hurts." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
15. FAILED...FISA passed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
17. ahh..."Snowball's chance in hell"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
18. What exactly is the "compromise" part of it?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. The Senate just said that phone companies have retroactive immunity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. "Republican Compromise" is what it is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
21. Senate will vote next week. Chances they will reject? zero to none |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
24. let's see our candidate walk the walk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-20-08 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
29. Realistic? ZERO. ZIP. ZILCH. NADA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC