Talk show host uses Walter Reed Building 18 as a reason socialized medicine will fail

Selatius

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-07-07 11:42 AM
Original message

Talk show host uses Walter Reed Building 18 as a reason socialized medicine will fail

Edited on Wed Mar-07-07 11:44 AM by Selatius

You probably haven't been following this story carefully. Perhaps you should. An investigative reporting team from The Washington Post investigated conditions at the Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington .. particularly the outpatient facilities. What they found was deplorable. There was mold, there were rats, and there was no small amount of grime and filth. Our injured soldiers were waiting interminable lengths of time for the most basic services. In short, the place was a mess. In the aftermath of the investigation the General in charge of Walter Reed resigned .... followed by the Secretary of the Army. Let's dispense with the PC language here. They didn't resign. They were fired. The American people won't tolerate this type of shabby treatment for our injured soldiers.

President Bush is going to appoint a commission to investigate all of this. Whoopee. Another government commission. Can't wait.

While they're cleaning up this mess at Walter Reed ... here's what you need to know. This treatment that was being delivered to our injured soldiers is the future of your health care. This is what you, if you're somewhat young, and most certainly your children have to deal with as the United States moves inexorably toward socialized medicine. Government health care.

A recent poll shows that three-fourths of all Americans want Universal Health Insurance. That's right .... the people conducting the poll actually capitalized Universal Health Insurance.

Let's dispel something right now. It's not insurance these people want, it's a medical payment plan. The purpose of insurance is to reimburse you for unexpected losses. The cost of regular health care, and this includes the normal costs associated with a pregnancy, are not unexpected. We should budget for these costs just as we would budget for the expenses of owning a home or a car.

http://boortz.com/nuze/200703/03052007.html#walterreed

Tell me, was health care in Building 18 privatized and given over to a third party company to administer? Am I mistaken here? Also, if we examine things like social security and medicare, isn't it true that those two entities are not under the control of the Bush White House but are considered separate from that? To the point where the budget for Medicare and Social Security are considered separate from the General Fund of the US Congress?

If it is true that health care at 18 was privatized, would the onus not be on those who favor for-profit institutions running health care to prove that they are, indeed, better able to handle health care than a non-profit government entity with the primary goal of delivering health care instead of generating a profit for the shareholders as the prime goal?