Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Janet Jackson's Boob Is Thrown Out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:06 PM
Original message
Janet Jackson's Boob Is Thrown Out
Or something like that
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/27/janet-jackson-super-bowl-flap-appeals-court-ruling-throws-out-fcc-indecency-fine-against-cbs/

Remember how the Janet Jackson “Boob Gate” story had the angry Conservative watch dog groups up in arms which as usual filtered down into the MSM? A court threw out the ridiculous fine against CBS.

When Janet Jackson’s now infamous “wardrobe malfunction” occurred at the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show in Houston, any viewer who blinked missed the nine-sixteenths of a second exposure of her right breast as fellow performer Justin Timberlake tugged at her costume..

Not so fleeting was the near-hysterical reaction of the Federal Communications Commission, which launched a four-year morality crusade against indecency on the public airwaves and fined CBS $550,000. FCC officials failed to establish that CBS had advance knowledge of the stunt and wrongly concluded that Jackson and Timberlake were employees of the network.

In going after CBS, the FCC abandoned a long-held policy of ignoring brief, unscripted incidents of nudity or vulgarity beyond the control of broadcasters. The commission, then headed by chairman Michael Powell, also went after Fox Broadcasting for incidents in which Cher and Nicole Ritchie uttered expletives during awards shows. Moved by the tempests on a TV screen, Congress jumped into the act by increasing indecency penalties tenfold.

The judges sensibly ruled that Jackson and Timberlake were independent contractors rather than CBS employees, and that the FCC had changed the rules of its indecency enforcement without giving notice to broadcasters…read on

Brent Bozell’s nutty PTC is up in arms over this decision. Here’s a little info on the PTC

It was discovered in 2004 that Brent Bozell’s group called the PTC filed 99.8% of all complaints to the FCC. Read Jeff Jarvis’: “The shocking truth about the FCC: Censorship by the tyranny of the few.” Jarvis also lists a litany of frivious complaints filed by the PTC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. For christ's sake. Put her boob in jail and be done with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can the rest of her go with it? I haven't liked her stuff since "Rhythm Nation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is STILL going on?
The FTC has WAY too much time on their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarthDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The FCC, not the FTC

And the FCC has been out of this for a long time - - what happened this past week is that the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (covering PA, DE, and NJ; a fairly sensible appeals court) threw out the fine on appeal. It was a good development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds kinda drastic. Did they at least let her keep the other one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. If this story had gone on much longer the ratings wouldnt be the only thing to sag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. You know, I've always liked Janet Jackson's boob - actually
both her boobs. I think it's a shame we can't see more of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Put me down as in favor of her bewbies being thrown out as often as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. 'Tempest in a Teacup'*....
...broadened to Tempest in a TV! One wonders what those conservative watch-kittens who concern themselves with such 'indiscretions' as this do for fun.... watch the grass grow in order to early catch the wayward dandelion which would have the gall to grow defiantly on their precisely manicured lawns?

These self appointed morality police must be apoplectic over such shows as are on Comedy Central. If it were up to me I would strap them to a chair ala-'A Clockwork Orange' style and force 'em to watch the entire run of South Park. If they didn't begin giggling by season three, I'd say they were too far gone to be allowed loose in society.

Glad to see that our ever vigilant Congress taking time off from their busy schedules to lend their hand in this issue too. One can only imagine the fierce debating this important matter must have caused before being passed on to the House Judiciary.

This all causes me to wonder if the silky smooth "BOOB OF JUSTICE" is still covered. Does anyone know if that songbird Ashcroft's drapery has been removed yet or is America's Justice still hogtied?

(*Tempest in a Teacup-that'll be my name should I ever feel brave enough to infiltrate the freep-republic! What fun it would be to live up to it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCDem60 Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Tit for Tat(NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC