Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bravest soul you will meet today: CIA Whistleblower

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:10 AM
Original message
The Bravest soul you will meet today: CIA Whistleblower
I wish there was some way to send him our appreciation:

CIA vet may face repercussions for revealing agency secrets


A 25-year CIA veteran has written a unauthorized, 384-page book that sharply criticizes the mismanagement and misdoings of the agency, creating an unprecedented test of the rights of former employees to reveal potentially harmful information.
Advertisement

"The Human Factor: Inside the CIA’s Dysfunctional Intelligence Culture" was written under the pseudonym "Ishmael Jones" to protect people the author has met who didn't know he was working undercover, CQ Politics reported.

Jones denies that the work contains any classified information and said he wrote the book to "improve the system and help it defend ourselves and our allies."

"I realized the CIA’s clandestine service was broken," the author said in an interview with FrontPage Magazine. "My mission has always been to defend America, and for many years I sought to do this by producing intelligence as an active CIA officer. Today, using this book as a tool, I seek to defend America by working to fix our broken clandestine service."

Jones is donating the book's earnings to the family of a soldier killed in Iraq and said he is ready for the consequences of publishing his book.

"I’m ready to take whatever they have to do," Jones said of his former employer.

He may have a lot to take.

Former CIA operative Frank Snepp faced heavy repercussions after he skipped agency censors and published an account of his Vietnam tour titled "Decent Interval: An Insider’s Account of Saigon’s Indecent End, Told by the CIA’s Chief Strategy Analyst in Vietnam."

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/CIA_vet_may_face_punishment_for_0802.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Best quotes were at the end, and very important to understand because it
also happens in the military:

But Jones saves his hottest anger for what he describes as self-dealing CIA managers who, he says, have avoided or mismanaged clandestine operations around the globe.

Since 9/11, he writes, many CIA "mandarins" (its most senior officials) have retired from the agency to "get rich" as private contractors with their old employer.

And they’re not being replaced by people with on-the-ground counter-terrorism experience, he says, despite the agency's constant ballyhoo about gearing up for "the long war" against terrorist groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes the 'mandarins' are being replaced, 'the decider' just announced overhaul of US 'intelligence'
and within hours Blackwater announced it is now in the 'intelligence' business. :sarcasm:

The 'overhaul' should place 'intelligence' squarely under control of private entities. The 'Intelligence' community will then mirror the MIC, where contractors manage contractors under the name of governance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. They found the problems and now they are accentuating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. This book calling for indictment of Bush for murder uses CIA sources
Vincent Bugliosi (former state attorney)
Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20400.htm
(Congressional Hearing)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Welcome to the American Gulag
As a former CIA officer who questioned the system, I can assure mister Jones that he should grow eyes in the back of his head and maintain his proficiency with small arms.

They will do anything and spend Millions to discredit him in any way possible.

That psychological evaluation that all prospective CIA employees go through prior to employment will be used to formulate an attack plan to push every button and manipulate his psyche in order to make him crack.

They will drive him to poverty and then provoke him with multiple illegal lures in order to send him to prison where he will be under their total 24/7 control.

They will recruit members of his family and others close to him to engage in informing and initiating provocations.

Anyone who tries to overtly assist him will be targeted as well.

If, by some chance, he is able to find employment, it will be because they have access and they will provoke fellow employees to initiate industrial accidents in an attempt to kill or maim him.

Persons of influence in his community will begin a rumor campaign to turn his neighbors and city officials against him.

I know this from first-hand experience. It happened to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Habibi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I would be interested to know more of your story
should you feel inclined to tell it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I have over 25 years worth.
It would be a very thick tome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Habibi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Fair enough.
Memoirs then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. I just want my privacy and fair and due process for these assholes
It's more than they gave me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I hope that we are seeing a change in the tide.
People should not be afraid of their governments. Yes, the plural was intentional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The governments we see and the ones invisible to all but insiders.
WE used to say at the CIA that there were two kinds of people: Those on the inside and those on the outside.

Laws only apply to those on the outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. That is my perception...
Edited on Sun Aug-03-08 08:50 PM by BushDespiser12
had a family member who was a CEO -- but was kept at arm's length from the back room conversations where the real motives and strategies were discussed. He battled to initiate positive change through negotiating other channels for capital. He stuck his neck out, he lost.

It is a merciless crowd in those smokey back rooms where the key focus is to protect their power and position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Has your story been published?
I bet LaLa would like to talk to you about it.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It probably never will be.
The CIA would never allow that truth to surface.


Stalin had nothing on these guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. To be fair.
There are multiple layers within the intelligence community.

Only a small core of insiders are engaged in the really dirty work, the rest are career government employees trying to do a good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Now that their standard procedure of operation have come to light,
how do they manage to recruit good people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The Russian comedian Yakob Smirnoff had it pegged.
In Soviet Union, no need to look for party on Saturday Night, Party find you.

When I was recruited back in the late 70's, very few people who submitted applications without being approached first were ever hired. I only knew of one and he had some very specialized skills and prior service in Special Forces.

My first contact was 10 years before becoming a career employee. Most are referrals from other CIA officers or sons and daughters of current or former employees. My father had been a member of the OSS, so that helped.

I heard one figure of 1 in 35,000 were hired off the street. Over the years, it created a climate of nepotism and cronyism that was to the detriment of the Agency and the security of the US.

I remember one case of a son of a senior CIA manager who came on as a summer intern and worked in my shop. The boy was a classic incompetent frat rat with a sense of entitlement. My supervisor had to write his performance report and even asked me to review it to ensure is was as fair as possible. He gave the kid more than an even break but his father blew his stack over it and ordered it be re-written. My supervisor, was almost demoted for it and resigned soon afterward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. This explains a lot!
Nepotism explains why things never change, and why a level of arrogance continues in the agency to the detriment of the good civil servants who still exist there. I've seen this same crazy thing with ex-military. Family members in the military network, and before you know it, they have enough power to extend their influence into the community through people with similar backgrounds and interest. And they do the most underhanded things to take care of their own. Like beefing up a kid's resume by overstepping the process so that on paper, they look like they are a step in front of the pack. It's a weird system where you can have someone who took off on an extended vacation during the school year, missing out on classes and games, and injured during the rest of the season, and still, at the end of the year, they're given the most Athletic Award! The only thing you can deduce is that they got the award for signing up for the military! Meanwhile the young player with talent or the old player who played through hurts and made every important game, gets treated like they didn't measure up. Because the coaches have to talk them down, in order to sell the swindle. Well, the community has eyes. The problem I see with this system, is that I don't for one minute believe that that first bump they got to help them get into the military, is the last of these dirty tricks. If it was, I could live with it. These kind of dastardly things undermine the entire process and when people lose confidence in the system, the system loses that which it needs the most. Freedom to maneuver behind closed doors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Read about this yesterday.
Thanks for getting this more visibility.

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. K & R
For the OP *and* for the comments. Holy crap.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Sibel Edmonds' whistleblowers organization is what he should join
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. I talked to him on the radio Friday night; a right wing shill show.
Edited on Sun Aug-03-08 10:22 PM by Gabi Hayes
he VERY suspciously denied that Plame spent any meaningful time outside her Langley cubicle, and questioned her value as a NOC.

he also defended Bush as being a victim of the CIA.

see for yourself:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3718658
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. google his name and see how many right wing sites come up. you did
notice that the OP link was FrontPage, yes?

no warning bells there?

I'm telling you, he vociferously denied that Bush had ANY blame WRT CIA disfunction.

haven't any of you heard about/read State of War? that one, thin book puts the complete lie to any craven defense of Bush regime innocence in the face of CIA 'incompetence'

I smell a plant in the Bush regime war vs. CIA

anyone care to comment on that, which has been a not infrequent topic of discussion here

I wonder if Lala is aware of this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Gabi, this is my gut reaction, without having further information:
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 07:10 AM by The Backlash Cometh
Yes, he could be a Bush shill, but that doesn't mean that everything that he says that is negative about the CIA is wrong or false. Sometimes, the only way that we peons can see what really goes on in the backroom, is when there is a mayor conflict in the backroom -- a Clash of the Titans between two opposing powerful forces. Then, each side will try to weaken the other side by revealing the other side's secrets to the public.

The CIA has already done this. Remember the CIA already revealed information about the Bush Administration in order to discredit them, and that information turned out to be true. Now, maybe with the Bush Administration's green light, this CIA guy retaliates by spilling information to discredit the CIA. WE in turn, must separate the chaff from the wheat. Now that he has our attention, he might think he has our confidence to plug the Bush Administration, but if we're wise, we'll just milk the information we find useful, and then use it to mount a scorched earth scenario between the dark side of the CIA and the White House.

Sometimes these inner fights are the closest thing to the truth that we peons will ever get. That is the only way that the "shadow government" will be seen -- when it begins to implode. So, don't think in polar terms. I think this guy brings information that we need to hear, but he is obviously not 100% saint according to the information you bring to the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. You would think by now I would be use to the head spinning.
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 06:58 AM by The Backlash Cometh
I have to go back and read the article to find out if he was still working for the CIA. I would not be surprised if he was angry at the CIA, but still held Republican values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. did you see the Amazon page? apparently the same Ishmael
had something to do with the Starr Report

check it out.

WTF is up with that?

I think he's a player in the game between Bush and the CIA. the fact that he says the CIA needs to be broken up and started over again is a good thing, but that comports with the entire new realignment of the intel agencies, which puts the DCIA no longer at the head. his support for Bush reveals his true agenda, and makes me skeptical of his motivation, despite what I posted in my thread about his taking no money

his disingenuousness re: Plame is also a warning light

it's an interesting game this guy is playing. why the pseudonym? what' his real name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Oh, I support a realignment of the CIA,
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 08:20 AM by The Backlash Cometh
but he won't get to decide where the lines get drawn. He'll just help the dismantling to come along sooner.

You do remember that the CIA almost got completely dismantled in the early 90s? The FBI was giving Congress the information they needed to support it. I believe that's when the FBI's jurisdiction grew outside our borders? No selfless act on the FBI's part, but, the CIA's dirty tricks and spy problem had come to light and the agency lost popularity with the public, which makes Bill Clinton's decision to appoint James Woolsey as CIA director in the early 90s all the more curious. Woolsey is a known neo-con and he flows easily between the Democratic and Republican party. Yet, it was well known that Clinton did not have regular meetings with Woolsey. In fact, I think he had none. Don't you find that curious? Why appoint someone you are not politically aligned with to a position in an agency which could really hurt you? Yet, that was a pattern with Clinton's appointments. For all his brilliance, his attempts at partisanship appointments was what destroyed him.

Frankly, I think all this talk from our Democratic candidates for partisan healing is a bullshit attempt to protect neo-con types within the Democratic party who don't want to feel the full force of our wrath. They must be pretty good donors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. The true motive for dismantling the CIA
is to remove the remaining career civil service officers that try to make an honest analysis and present the intelligence in an unbiased manner, replace them with true believers and turn the CIA into a taxpayer funded academy for private contractors.

I think the opposite should be done. Get rid of all the secret society types and those who owe their allegiance to other than the Constitution, get rid of all but the most necessary private contractors and rebuild the career service with talented and honest employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Then we need more articles to get into the mainstream to convince them
that there is a darkside, and an upside to the CIA and the military, and the darkside is often found in the mandarins who try to use their positions to build their pension plans.

It would help if the next president understood this trap, so he wouldn't capitulate to the darkside by giving them mandarin positions, the way that Clinton did.

I like your analysis. I wish someone would hire you to be a consultant for the transition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Please don't put any ideas in someone's head.
I've had enough of Washington to last several lifetimes. I like where I am. They tried so hard to disconnect me from the system that, eventually, I realized I didn't need any of it. I have my family and live somewhere that people are beginning to conclude that I was right in what I say about Bush Gang and their masters.

Anyway, who would water my garden when I'm gone?

I appreciate the thought. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I hope that before we decide to move out of our community, that I
will see the same changes in the neighborhood that you are experiencing. I understand the garden problem. It's a conundrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. You Have A Far Stronger Stomache Than I Have
This was to be expected...the misinformation campaign has begun. Last night I was scanning around in the car..how silly of me to think I could find something worth listening. I ended up on a 50,000 blowtorch with some right wing asshat interviewing some goon who keep up the "what we don't know about Obama" crap...and of course, this was all about his really being a "Muslim" and how his birth certificate has been doctored.

Who cares what this schmuck says...a Judge determined her NOC status...case closed, Scooter is a traitor and so are the other chickenshits in this regime hiding behind him. My hopes are that the Wilsons get their day in court and out comes all the dirty secrets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. We'll have to dissect the information with a finely sharpened scalpel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC