Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

if I take someone's life,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 08:47 PM
Original message
if I take someone's life,
I see little difference in the moral acceptability of the method I employ, be it fists, knife, gun, napalm or nuclear bomb. It is a question of efficiency, not ethics, at that point.

Civilians have been specifically targeted in modern warfare for almost 100 years. The making of a war is no more moral for its use of conventional armaments. This is not to dodge the importance of nuclear weapons or their use in Japan, but rather to point out that they, almost alone, erase the illusion that some of us are safe in our homes while others have to deal with the reality that our wars create. How many noncombatants have died in Iraq due to conventional arms to nary a twitch from much of the rest of the world? What reaction would have been created by the same number of deaths from a nuclear attack on Baghdad?

Peace to the dead of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, of Dresden, of Hamburg, of London, of Warsaw, of Nanjing, and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Note to the wise
war has always targetted civies...

That is the truth....

And as much as people want to believe otherwise, we truly have... didn't start in modern times either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. guess I had in mind in the "aerial bombing" sense.
But yeah, it has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Use infectious cows sent over the ramparts
in medieval Europe, or a bomber, the only difference is the efficiency

The Geneva Conventions were supposed to spare civies, and I could make the case that the only war that happened (in limited fashion) was WW I

Hell, the troops that came to the promised land put every man, woman and child, (and their animals) to the sword.

Less efficient, but in the end you are still dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. excellent point.
I hadn't considered siege warfare, much less Biblical. :)

(did I really put a smiley after that?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, yes you did
I spent ten years as a medic with a national red cross society.

Got shot plenty of times....

We used to joke the drug dealers have not signed the damned conventions

We also used to joke that them red crosses were wonderful target acquisition devices. And if you speak to any army medic or navy corpsman don't be too surprised to hear that joke as well. It is kind of very international...

Trust me, where the rubber meets the road at times you think they are nice theory

That said a couple times the drug dealers were justified (I had volunteers for dinner that day)... for those who don't know the theory my ambulances lost all their neutrality when they loaded, well intended mind you, an Army LT who was armed to the teeth and injured. I did remove all toys, but we were no longer neutral... so getting shot on the way out was actually kosher. Thankfully they didn't hit anything vital, mind you they came THIS CLOSE to the Oxygen regulator. I considered leaving all O2 tubes back at HQ if we were sent back. Yes, you need Oxygen to take care of patients, but hit one of these suckers just right... you are going to go sky hi.

It does remove some of the horrors, that is the conventions do... but only when all sides are willing to play by them and be ahem nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Been making that argument in another thread all night.
Any almanac of history says you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's always civilians
I think most countries have either formal or informal rules against assassination, but killing civilians is just fine.

Way to protect their own asses, when they are the ones starting the wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't forget El Chorillo.
Poppy incinerated 100,000 Panamanians in a matter of hours.

And then there were those pesky Injuns....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. And any "Christian" who says that the Innocent Dead are NOT Jesus, doesn't
know what Christianity is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's true, but civilians survived Dresden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. civilians survived Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Very, very few.
Although your point stands, there is a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. it's crude as hell to point out that the issue is efficiency,
but there it is. That's the difference. Firestorm from hundreds of planes or a blast from one, it doesn't make much difference to the dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC