Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone Please Explain To Me Why We Are Flying Into A War Zone...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AllexxisF1 Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:34 PM
Original message
Someone Please Explain To Me Why We Are Flying Into A War Zone...
Can someone please explain to me why we are sending our airmen into a war zone that is still for a better part "hot". I can understand the need for aid as soon as possible but shouldn't that be done by the Red Cross or the U.N.


or...


Is this the setup we have all been talking about, instead of Iran shooting at one of our ships instead it will be Russian shooting down one of our humanitarian planes.



Puppet Georgia is told to invade Ossetia -> Russia takes the bait and takes over the whole country -> U.S. sends in relief planes while its still hot and one gets shot down -> U.S. fires back at Russian war planes -> escalates to WW3 -> Bush stays in power and election is canceled.


This is like some bad dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nightmare. Am I wrong---->didn't Georgia do a lot of damage in
South Ossetia too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllexxisF1 Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes.
Yes they did ...probably under the advice from Darth himself.


I'm sorry but this just looks like the biggest con job to me. Do you all see it that way too?


This whole damn thing just plain looks manufactured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. No election for you. State of war soon and suspension of the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Absolutely it looks manufactured! Gee, one MORE time GWB is
out of Washington, D.C. and yet another disaster accrues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a "Thank-you" for Georgia being in Iraq and an assertion of union for the Russinas to see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Brinkmanship. Bush & Co have been faced by Putin. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. it does seem like conflict w/ Russia instead of Iran...so far. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Time's running out. They have to skip over the Iranian foreplay...
and go straight to the Main Event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. perhaps it turns out Georgia was more direct than Iran but same goal? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. One wonders if Russia has been warning us off an Iranian attack all along. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
27. maybe some of us were paying to much attention to Iran
so the neo cons are going after Russia for the oil pipeline that goes through Georgia. More people getting killed, these monsters in our government must be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's why.
Edited on Wed Aug-13-08 01:55 PM by doublethink


on edit: to include a link .... some of this may be 'over the top' .... but maybe not? :shrug:


South Ossetia: superpower oil war
here ..... http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3615.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. It is all about the OIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. increases the possiblity of getting shot down?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Simple. They are human trip-wires
Edited on Wed Aug-13-08 02:08 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Not to endorse or condemn the concept, just to explain it:

There cold war framework was about Russia's nuclear arsenal, not their ideology. All interactions were based on rules designed to trigger nuclear war, which were dampening rules since neither side wanted that outcome.

Notice that only one side would commit troops in a proxy war. Whoever got troops in first locked out the other side. Stalin promised aid to North Korea but didn't deliver it because he couldn't have Russians and Americans fighting each other directly. In Vietnam we got killed by plenty of Russian weapons, but not Russian troops. In Afghanistan Russians were killed by American weapons, but not troops.

(One concern during the Cuban missile crisis was that if we bombed the missile sites we would kill Russians, since their technicians and troops were the ones installing the missiles.)

American forces in Germany and South Korea are not expected to prevent invasions militarily. They are there as human sheilds... "You cannot invade this non-nuclear country without killing some soldiers from America who will then nuke you."

The point of sending Americans to Georgia is to say, "I you lob too many bombs in here you will eventually blow up American troops."

Again, not an endorsement of the policy, just an explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mopar151 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Professional hostages
Like in "the Godfather"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. A difficult concept to express on a recruiting poster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Two words:
OIL

PIPELINE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because someone never believed that this was just a film

with a lot of cool jets and excellent aerial footage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8rZWw9HE7o

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. I guess the United Nations humanitarian aid isn't available.
Gotta send our bombers, fighters, and cargo planes. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. There already are aid workers there.
The IOCC (International Orthodox Christian Charities) is already there and working with the refugees out of their offices in Moscow and Tblisi.

http://iocc.org/news/8-11-08georgia.aspx

I'm sure other aid organizations are there already, too. I'm not sure why we're sending stuff in now when things are still shaky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because Bush is both an oilman and the war president
He only likes to go to war when oil is involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hard to see this as anything other than a provocation
News flash for the Bush cartel: unlike Iran, the Russians really DO have nuclear weapons. Lots of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. Something suspicious
I know a guy who knows a guy who said that the US military didn't want to send in the humanitarian flights until all hostilities were over and everything was safe. It appears they were overridden by someone in Washington...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCollar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
23. Gulf of Tonkin comes to mind...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. Neocons know they can't win elections with talks of peace. They need war to
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 09:52 AM by bushisanidiot
further their agenda. It's all been set up for McCain to continue with their agenda. What I want to know is, did McCain proposition the president of Georgia, or did he proposition McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
25. to wag the dog for a new war that the GOP can use for the election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
26. I have a theory:
While everyone is focusing on South Osseita and whether or not the Russians are pulling out of Gori, what's of espeical interest to me is the Russian occupation of the Black Sea port of Poti.

read this, from 1997:

"Poti, on Georgia's Black Sea coast, is the most important port in the Caucasus and is likely to become a major center for economic growth in the region with the development of offshore oil reserves in the Caspian Sea. Besides being well-suited to serve destinations in Georgia, Poti has serviceable road and rail links with Armenia and Azerbaijan, and is connected by sea with a growing list of major Black Sea ports. Regular passenger and cargo ferry service opened to Ilichevsk in Ukraine in December 1996. This route joins existing service to Burgas and Varna, Bulgaria, and Konstanza, Romania. Another container route to Istanbul is planned.

Poti's development potential, especially for infrastructure projects, has already begun to attract foreign companies. Sea-Land Services of the United States uses Poti as a key transshipment point for cargos from as far away as Central Asia. Sea-Land is also studying the modernization of piers and other port facilities. Bob Walsh Enterprises Incorporated of Seattle, Washington plans to develop a 200,000 square foot warehousing and distribution center in Poti. France's Alcatel Alsthom is planning investments in telecommunications in the city and is preparing to run an underwater fiber-optic cable from Poti under the Black Sea. Other U.S. and European companies are exploring projects that would lead to the development of Poti's port and infrastructure as a transportation hub for the Caucasus region."

http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps3997/9704g2.htm

The Daily Telegraph reports:

"Just five months ago, Georgia's President Mikhail Saakashvili was touting a $70million deal which he hoped would transform the Black Sea port of Poti, creating 20,000 jobs over the next five years.

Under the deal Arab investors were set to plough $200million into developing a new port alongside the existing commercial port, trebling Poti's capacity to 25 million tonnes of cargo a year.

Now those plans could lie in ruins as the port has been cut off by advancing Russian troops. The 51,000 inhabitants of Poti will not remember the port's 150th anniversary with any affection.

. . . Independent experts said that the blockade of Poti would be felt across the regions as products shipped through the Black Sea port feed neighbouring countries Armenia and Azerbaijan.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/georgia/2541265/Georgia-Russians-close-off-strategic-Georgian-port.html

The Russians hold on to Poti, they have the entire region by the balls. That's why the US Navy is on it's way. Nevermind about the "humanitarian" flights, that's a sideshow. Let's see what happens when the US navy and the Russian Black Sea fleet start playing chicken with each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. IMPORTANT INFORMATION - THE US NAVY IS ENTERING THE BLACK SEA...
Please consider starting a thread on this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC