Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US commander in Iraq: "I need more soldiers, more time"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:07 PM
Original message
US commander in Iraq: "I need more soldiers, more time"
Today's Christian Science Monitor gives us this headline.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0309/p10s01-woiq.html

"Gen. David Petraeus assessed Thursday what he needs to succeed, in his first press conference after almost a month on the job as commander of US forces in Iraq.

The core of his assessment: He needs 2,200 more soldiers and more time. But the general also warned that those things alone won't be enough to bring success."


Doctors are body mechanics, lawyers are legal lubricants, and generals are always in need of more troops, weapons and fuel. Half-truths? hardly. But when the only tool in your tool box is a hammer, every problem begins to suspiciously look like a nail. The Nail that is today's IraqNam is no different.

There was a fairly decent interview on NPR early this morning, and the person admitted that the surge was not only bad policy, but doomed to fail. On the other hand, all other policy choices were even worse and even more likely to fail. The NPR interviewer said, "well, that's not very promising. This is quite different than what the president and his people have been telling us."
the response was, "It is also the cold, hard truth. There are no good choices, there are no good options. Only many worse than others."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. "when the only tool in your tool box is a hammer, every problem begins to suspiciously
look like a nail." That's a great line, and so apt.

Enough! At this rate, this war will go on indefinitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. once again: BUSHBUNGLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. bushco created this mess, therefore bushco must pay for this mess.........
by resigning from office in disgrace or face removal from office by impeachment. The blame for Iraq rests solely with bushco and no one else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. ""More" = more redeployments of the same people over and over and over, until








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. oh dear. thank you for the images.
I wish that all of America could see them.

What have we allowed to happen to our country? Where were we so wrong, so asleep, so unaware? How can we stop this evil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. total surge to 27,100, a 21-percent increase over original expectations.
The surge was originally advertised as topping out at 21,500 additional troops. But on Wednesday, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that Petraeus had requested 2,200 more military police – to serve as jailors for an expected increase in detainees – and that an additional 2,400 support troops would be needed, bringing the total surge to 27,100, a 21-percent increase over original expectations.

Frederick Kagan, an analyst at the American Enterprise Institute and an advocate of adding troops, blames the White House for the impression that the surge is growing. He says support troops were always going to be needed, but the Bush adminstration failed to make that clear. But he adds that Petraeus will ask for even more troops if he thinks they're needed. "Of course the enemy has a vote and the situation can change."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. yet today, that increase to the surge is 8400 according to my local paper
21.5 + 8.4 = 30,000 more targets, ill-equiped, exhausted, being led to injury and death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC