Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: Lehman Bros creditors accuse JP Morgan of freeezing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 11:34 AM
Original message
Breaking: Lehman Bros creditors accuse JP Morgan of freeezing
cash before collapse.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article4882281.ece
<snip>
JP Morgan ‘brought down’ Lehman Brothers
Iain Dey and Danny Fortson

JP MORGAN has been accused by its Wall Street rivals of dealing the final hammer blow that forced Lehman Brothers into collapse in a sensational claim that threatens to spark a colossal legal battle.

The giant American bank is alleged to have frozen $17 billion (£9.6 billion) of cash and securities belonging to Lehman on the Friday night before its failure.

According to Lehman’s biggest creditors, this was what precipitated the liquidity crisis that embroiled the firm, forcing it into Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on the morning of Monday, September 15.

The allegations have been raised in a filing at the bankruptcy court in New York, lodged late last week. Lehman’s biggest creditors include almost every big firm on Wall Street, most of Europe’s heavyweight banks and insurance companies as well as a slew of Japanese and Chinese institutions that are owed several hundred billion dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. So ANOTHER ONE can't take any responsibility! Well, at least
they're not blaming the poor people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. So JP Morgan didn't do this? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePhoenix Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. JP Morgan Brought Down Lehman Brothers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Just broke on GEM$NBC
LOL :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. JP Morgan is living up to its name & reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. It was rumored that JP Morgan did the same thing around the turn of the last century.
They supposedly spread rumors about some banks being insolvent. It was called the Panic of 1907. Shortly thereafter, JP Morgan was an instrumental force in passing the Federal Reserve Act.

Some things don't seem to ever change......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. If you haven't had a chance
this is some very rivoting reading:

Bear Stearns (Vanity Fair, August 2008)

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/bear_stearns200808?currentPage=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. Thanks! Bookmarked to read later. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Would not surprise me at all. They want to be the biggest financial corp in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well isn't that just fucked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. AHEM!!! WHERE ARE THE BAILOUT SUPPORTERS ON THIS? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hiding
They achieved their agenda and I expect them to return for the next bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoUsername Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. You nailed it. Their job is done. Well, for now anyway.
They'll surface again when it's time to promote "Bailout: The Sequel."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. What is the problem? We knew SOMEONE had done this, right? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Their job here is done...Until the next $700 billion is needed...
Suckers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. this entire "crash" and bailout scam was a pre-engineered ripoff.
Is the economy in trouble? Of course it is. 28 years of supply-side theft has all but destroyed it.

The "crisis" and bailout have nothing to do with that other than using the threat of collapse to engender fear, panic and a horrible legislative blunder.

We've been had.

Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Remember the old days when, if Paulson didn't get his unrestrained
power to spend $700 billion, yesterday, the result tomorrow would be too horrific to even describe it on teevee? That was two weeks ago. And, looks like it's going to be a couple more weeks to a month to put Ben/Henry Capitol Management in business.

So, have we, indeed, been had? Sure. Since the "crisis" was strictly limited to Paulson's spewage on or around Sept. 26 and seemed to fizzle long before the funds were awarded. And now that they have it, suddenly we have all the time in the world to begin valuing the assets and begin distributing the funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. This is bothersome: January 2008, it was written
Edited on Sun Oct-05-08 07:21 PM by chill_wind


"The world's stock markets are in meltdown so the Fed came in with an inter-meeting move to try to stop the panic," Christopher Rupkey, senior economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi.

Global financial markets had plunged Monday as investors grew more concerned about the possibility that the United States, the world's largest economy, could be headed into a recession. Many markets suffered their biggest declines since the September 2001 terrorist attacks


http://www.annistonstar.com/breaking/2008/as-wireupdate-0122-0-8a22k1107.htm

I don't question the brutal deterioration of the economy over this time of the Bush admin, but these quotes and benchmarks were echoed in just this past week and are eerily familiar. What I question is what the Hell they have been doing and yes, there's an extremely strong feeling of manipulation going on here, if you look back to that date.

to crosspost a quick comment I just made in another thread--

LAST JANUARY. And Congressional Committee men and Paulson only emerged from that meeting a couple weeks ago "white-faced and ashen"? Only then? For whose consumption was this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Just check the discussions in February and March when Bush
and Paulsen were denying that the recession had started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. That was going to be my next google. Anybody have those?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Here are some
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Thank you malaise. Very much.
(What a contrast between the reading experiences of the apocalyptic Roubini and the Joseph Stiglitz interview).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. But as apocalyptic as Roubini was in February
he wasn't wrong. On the other hand we know that Stiglitz is comfortable in his skin.
I like this point - funny that both links mentioned 'a little froth'
What I find so amazing is that they didn't see this coming back in 2004, 2005 and 2006. There was a kind of complacency. Alan Greenspan was asked, "Is there a bubble?" He said, "A little froth in the economy. If there's a problem, we can take care of it." Well, when he said we can take care of it, he didn't say we can take care of it with billions and billions and billions of American taxpayer money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Excellent points.
What I appreciate about Stiglitz is his unflinching emphasis on the devastation of the economy by our military occupations.
I hope with all my heart that Obama will make that understanding an absolute priority in his planning and decision making from Day One.

I look forward to a day when I can change my sig line, although, tragically as he says--

"we're piled up debt that our children and grandchildren will be paying."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Stiglitz does not deny facts or fudge them
to suit neocon ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Here we go: "Yeah, we're on top of it."
Edited on Sun Oct-05-08 07:37 PM by chill_wind
"Mr. Secretary, thank you very much for coming by today to talk about the economic situation. We’ll be meeting later on this afternoon with the President’s Task Force on Financial Markets.

First of all, the secretary has given me an update. One thing is for certain — we’re in challenging times. But another thing is for certain — that we’ve taken strong and decisive action. The Federal Reserve has moved quickly to bring order to the financial markets.

Secretary Paulson has been — is supportive of that action, as am I. And I want to thank you, Mr. Secretary, for working over the weekend. You’ve shown the country and the world that the United States is on top of the situation.

Secondly, you’ve reaffirmed the fact that our financial institutions are strong and that our capital markets are functioning efficiently and effectively. We obviously will continue to monitor the situation and when need be, will act decisively, in a way that continues to bring order to the financial markets.

In the long run, our economy is going to be fine. Right now we’re dealing with a difficult situation and, Mr. Secretary, I want to thank you very much for your steady and strong and consistent leadership.

Thank you very much.


March 17, 2008, 10:14 am
Bush: ‘On Top of the Situation’ in the U.S. Markets

Henry J. Pulizzi reports on the White House.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/03/17/bush-on-top-of-the-situation-in-markets/





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. What a difference $700B makes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. OMG. Priceless retort! :-)
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gopbuster Donating Member (715 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
28. allegations and
Previous court documents have suggested that JP Morgan was owed $23 billion by Lehman in secured loans.

JP Morgan said: “These assertions raised by the creditors’ panel are unfounded conjecture. We will address them at the appropriate time in bankruptcy court.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
30. No. What brought them down was that they bet BIG that subprime was going to improve.
There was an article about this in the NY Times, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC