Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fascinating Idea: A Dam Across St. Lawrence Island?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 08:11 PM
Original message
Fascinating Idea: A Dam Across St. Lawrence Island?
Edited on Sun Nov-30-08 08:16 PM by BullGooseLoony
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Lawrence_Island

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Lawrence_Dam

http://www.cleverclimate.org/climate/21/plan_c_-_the_st_lawrence_dam/

http://www.global-greenhouse-warming.com/could-a-300-km-dam-save-the-arctic.html

(snip)

The plan describes how building a dam in the Bering Strait influences the three most relevant factors for both formation and melting of sea ice. These are temperature isolation, water salinity and water turbulence.

Placing it some 300 kilometres south of the narrowest point of the strait will lead to a decrease of temperature, salinity and dynamics (through decreased wind fetch) combined.

The dam would connect St. Lawrence Island in the Bering Sea with the mainland of Alaska and Siberia. All sweet water of the river Yukon would be kept north of the dam, slightly lowering salinity in the Chuckchi Sea, that is part of the Arctic Ocean.

Deliberately influencing salinity could indeed be of important influence, thinks Dr. Overland, of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

(snip)

Map:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=st.+lawrence+island&sll=-45.88953,169.715338&sspn=0.030946,0.089693&g=st.+lawrence+island+dam&ie=UTF8&ll=62.247466,-167.871094&spn=10.639165,45.922852&z=5&iwloc=addr

---------

A couple of drawbacks seem to be cutting off migration routes for whales and crab.

But there are some incredible economic and ecological possibilities in this plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I do not think we have money for this now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. What about the seismicity of that region?
I'd think that would be a serious problem to such a dam, especially if they built it by simply dropping rock into the path of the dam.

I don't know, and I'm sure the question has been considered, but it seems iffy to me.

Besides, I suspect there would be effects not yet thought of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC