The ongoing disgrace of NBC News and Brian Williams

[G_j]

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/11/30/mccaffrey/index.html

Glenn Greenwald
Sunday Nov. 30, 2008 09:34 EST
The ongoing disgrace of NBC News and Brian Williams


The New York Times's David Barstow, whose excellent and aggressive journalism led to the uncovering last April of the Pentagon's domestic propaganda program involving network "military analysts," today returns to this topic with another lengthy front-page exposé. Barstow focuses today on the numerous, undisclosed conflicts of interest of Gen. Barry McCaffrey, who continues to be featured frequently by NBC

News as an objective analyst as he opines about war policies in which he has a substantial (and concealed) financial stake.
Some of the key facts which Barstow reports concerning the improper behavior of McCaffrey and NBC News were documented all the way back in April, 2003, in this excellent article from The Nation, which Barstow probably should have credited today. That article -- entitled "TV's Conflicted Experts" -- detailed the numerous defense contractors to which McCaffrey had a substantial connection -- including Mitretek, Veritas and Integrated Defense Technologies, all featured by Barstow today -- and highlighted how the policies and viewpoints

McCaffrey was advocating as a "military analyst" on NBC directly benefited those companies.
Because those conflicts were brought to light by the anti-war Nation, and because that article was published in April, 2003, as the country was drowning in a war-crazed frenzy, NBC was able to blithely dismiss these concerns, unbelievably telling The Nation that its military analysts' business interests were "not their concern." Unsurprisingly, the Nation article generated little attention and controversy. Few people were interested back then in challenging war-praising retired Generals and the networks which were glorifying the invasion. NBC continued without objection to feature McCaffrey, and the similarly-conflicted retired Gen. Wayne Downing, as objective "military analysts."

Still, what was -- and remains -- most incredible about Barstow's April, 2008 exposé was that, to this day, the networks which featured these highly conflicted "analysts" have never uttered a word about the controversy over the Pentagon's program, despite the fact that it was the subject of an enormous front-page NYT story; members of Congress accused the Pentagon -- rightfully so -- of operating a potentially illegal propaganda operation and demanded information directly from the networks; both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton spoke out against the Pentagon's program; and even the Pentagon felt compelled to terminate the program in the wake of the controversy. None of that merited a mention by any of the networks, despite (more accurately: because of) the fact that their own reporting was so directly implicated by the controversy.

As I documented at length at the time, using the thousands of documents Barstow had obtained, the propaganda that the networks broadcast as a result of this "military analyst" program -- about Iraq, Guantanamo and a host of other related issues -- was very coordinated and, by design, implanted falsehoods in virtually every aspect of their "reporting".

..more..

[arcadian]

1. "GE - We bring good things to nuclear weapons."

n/t

[hootinholler]

2. Are there disclosure laws?

Or are they just best practices.

There should be people in jail over this, but, hey, what's one more little thing.

-Hoot

[G_j]

3. don't know

but it looks like just another brick in the wall

:banghead: :hide:

[barbtries]

4. is there an organized boycott of NBC

anywhere? i'll sign up - and it will be easy not to watch NBC since i don't have television anyway. :)

[Billy Burnett]

5. Are you kidding? "We" are addicted to David Gregory.

How many "David Gregory is a/an ______" thread a weeknight are there on average? Four? Five?

There's no way you could convince a majority of DUers to boycott MS/C/NBC.

:shrug: