Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Franken news: The disputed absentee ballots will be reviewed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:01 PM
Original message
Franken news: The disputed absentee ballots will be reviewed
http://blog.alfranken.com/2008/12/02/sos-directs-local-officials-to-review-uncounted-absentee-ballots/#more-755

New Breakthrough in Effort to Count Every Vote: Secretary of State Directs Local Officials to Review Uncounted Absentee Ballots
Posted in Press Releases on December 2nd, 2008

Local Officials Will Re-Examine And Sort Previously Rejected Ballots - Ballots That Do Not Meet A Legal Qualification For Rejection Will Be Separated Out

Franken Campaign Applauds Efforts Of Elections Officials

SAINT PAUL <12/02/08> – In a major development toward counting improperly rejected absentee ballots, the Secretary of State’s office today directed county auditors and county and city election officials to review all previously-rejected absentee ballots and determine whether they fall under one of the four legal reasons for rejecting a ballot. The absentee ballot review will begin on December 8.

The communication, from Deputy Secretary of State Jim Gelbmann, lays out the four legal reasons for rejecting an absentee ballot:

The ballot was rejected because the voter’s name and address on the return envelope are not the same as the information provided on the absentee ballot application.
The voter’s signature on the return envelope is not the genuine signature of the individual who made the application for the ballot and the signature is required under applicable Minnesota law, or the certificate has not been completed as prescribed in the directions for casting an absentee ballot.
The voter was not registered and eligible to vote in the precinct or has not included a properly completed voter registration application.
The voter had already voted at the election, either in person or by absentee ballot.
Previously-rejected absentee ballots that do not fall into one of those four categories will be placed in a fifth pile. Under Minnesota state law, there is no other legal reason for rejecting an absentee ballot.

Communications Director Andy Barr:

“We appreciate the Secretary of State’s guidance and the hard work of the local elections officials who have done such great work throughout the election process. That process is not complete until every vote is counted. And today’s directive is an important step in ensuring that happens.”

The Franken campaign is focused on making sure every vote is counted — not only those included in the recount, but also those absentee ballots that have been improperly rejected and those that appear to have been lost. The Secretary of State has said there are roughly 12,000 absentee ballots rejected this past election. The Secretary of State has also estimated that 500 of them were wrongly rejected — a number greater than the likely difference between Coleman and Franken at the end of the hand count. The Franken campaign actually estimates this pile is even larger — up to 1,000 ballots.

We are determined to ensure that every Minnesotan who cast a vote — either in person or via absentee — ought to have that vote counted. And whether it is at the county level, at the canvass board, in the courts or before the United States Senate, we don’t know yet. But because we believe the principle that every vote cast ought to be counted is universal, we remain confident these votes will be counted.

No recount should be considered complete or accurate until all the ballots are counted — that includes the improperly rejected absentee ballots, and any missing ballots from around the state.


This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008 at 14:47 and is filed under Press Releases. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

« Previous Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let me be the first to say it -- THIS IS HUGH!!!11!
Without the discarded absentees, Franken's chances of victory were looking grimmer by the hour. Now, it's anybody's game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anyone know what the count is now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whatever it takes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blues Heron Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. count every ballot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. the example of the signature
being different because the man had a stroke since registering his original signature. His absentee ballot was rejected. But it WAS his "genuine" signature and so did not violate any of the four rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I registered to vote when I was 18
I'm sure that my signature has changed since then.

Arthritis is another thing that will change your signature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Time alone will do it, without illness. My signature doesn't look the same as it
did when I registered at 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Agreed
I'm just glad that they are reviewing the ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. well, lets hope those 500 are for al.
"The Secretary of State has said there are roughly 12,000 absentee ballots rejected this past election. The Secretary of State has also estimated that 500 of them were wrongly rejected"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC